Jim Radcliffe, chairman of Manchester United, was denounced by the political and media establishment this week for his remark that ‘Britain in being colonised by immigrants’. Sir Keir Starmer found time to respond, calling his words ‘offensive and wrong’. Inevitably, Ratcliffe felt the need to apologise and now the FA is looking into his behaviour. Perhaps this was another ‘psy-op’, demonstrating to long-suffering white Britons that telling the truth on mass immigration has consequences.
In the infamous words of Tony Blair’s advisor Andrew Neather, opening the floodgates was ‘rubbing the Right’s nose in diversity’. The New Labour government was determined to smash traditional society, and the wrecking ball has been swinging ever since. The country has become almost unrecognisable to how it looked before the end of last century, due to a relentless influx from Africa and Asia.
Two and two do not add up to four, because while there are more of ‘them’, there are also less of ‘us’. Nobody is being forcibly removed from their homeland to let immigrants take their place, thus the ‘great replacement’ must be a delusional conspiracy theory. Yet anyone who is not wilfully blind can see that vast swaths of our cities have undergone an urban clearance of the indigenous. And ordinary white Britons are not merely being pushed out (‘white flight’); they are subjected to ideological forces that threaten their survival.
Many schools in Birmingham, London and Leicester have not a single white British pupil, and the ethnic explosion is happening across the land. If this is all happening organically, there is certainly no institutional effort to stop it. On the evidence of words spoken and pacts made by the powers-that-be, the rapid transformation from a predominantly white Christian country to a morass of foreign cultures is the desired outcome. From the rainbow of different races and religions, one is likely to outgrow the others (Britain is projected to have a Muslim majority later in this century).
Why would our rulers want this? Let us consider the intellectual drivers, or the four Cs,of radical demographic change: Cultural Marxism, Coudenhove-Kalergi’s vision, the Cloword-Pliven strategy and Common Purpose training.
Cultural Marxism
The West, whether its bemused or apathetic populace realises it or not, is undergoing a cultural revolution. The shrill demands of Woke warriors are at the vanguard of a strategy that began a hundred years ago, at the Institut für Sozialforschung in Frankfurt, where Marxist professors realised that nothing really changes unless the culture changes. Cultural Marxism deviated from the economic determinism of Karl Marx, using Freudian analytical concepts to undermine the false consciousness that reinforces social structures. The targets may be summarised as faith, flag and family – the foundational elements of our culture that maintain order, morality and belonging.
Critical theorists of the Frankfurt School, being Jewish, fled the Third Reich in the 1930s and many emigrated to the USA (notably Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse). From radical departments at Columbia University and other leftist institutes, Cultural Marxist ideology was gradually introduced to American academic and political discourse, but it was masked by the progressive terminology of ‘equality’ or ‘diversity’. As Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals , advised: –
True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.
Globalist pushers of the ‘Great Reset’, who have no interest in Marxist ideology beyond its practical uses, exploit Cultural Marxism as a tried-and tested method to divide and rule. .
Coudenhove-Kalergi
Just as they refute the ‘Great Reset’ as merely a book written by Klaus Schwab on revitalising the global economy after Covid-19, fact-checkers claim that the ‘Kalergi Plan’ is a far-right conspiracy theory. Austrian aristocrat Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote a book, but not an official policy for demographic replacement. Move along now, nothing to see here.
In his Practical Idealism (1923), Coudenhove-Kalergi envisaged the future of Europe as unified, borderless, and an ethnic melting pot. Or did he? The text has often been distorted or taken out of context. As Practical Idealism is only available in German, I consulted a fellow writer and fluent German speaker, who owns a copy. The truth is that Coudenhove-Kalergi described a racial hierarchy, with white Europeans cast as intelligent but cold (befitting their climate), Africans as less smart but warmer, and Jews and Chinese having the ideal character and intellect. The latter would form a new nobility.
Coudenhove-Kalergi was a highly influential figure. He was first president of the Council of Europe, inaugural winner of the Charlemagne Prize in 1950, and proposer of Beethoven’s Ode to Joy as the European anthem. Fast forward to today, and Europe is certainly changing as Coudenhove-Kalergi predicted, with mass immigration and media promotion of biracial coupling. The exponential rise in arrivals from Africa and Asia was simultaneous to the elevation of the European Economic Community to EU superstate, and consequent dismantling of sovereignty and border control.
Governments have little power to enforce borders since the UN Migration Pact (signed in 2018 by prime minister Theresa May), which was the culmination of work by Peter Sutherland, the globalist and Goldman-Sachs executive appointed as the UN special representative for migration. Sutherland, who urged the EU to dilute national homogeneity through mass immigration, brought Coudenhove-Kalergi’s dream to reality.
Cloword-Pliven strategy
The massive fiscal debt of Western governments is the planned result of radical ideology. In 1966 two sociologists at Columbia University devised a strategy to wreck the social welfare system in the USA, purportedly to create an egalitarian society. Richard Cloword and Frances Fox Pliven were political activists inspired by Alinsky, the militant Chicago professor.
The Cloword-Pliven strategy entails deliberately overwhelming what they perceived as parsimonious federal assistance programmes. The ensuing social and economic chaos would lead to federal intervention in the form of a guaranteed income. The idea was pushed in the Democrat Party, where it fitted the nurturing of dependent client groups. The vehicle for the intended systemic breakdown is mass immigration from poorer regions. Currently half of Muslim adults in the UK are not paying income tax and are therefore net recipients of public money. But the millions who work in cheap labour – white, black or brown – will soon be made redundant by AI and automation, relegating their status to ‘useless eaters’ living on state handouts. .
Facilitated by a digital currency, basic universal income will ensure total dependence on the state. In this ultimate form of control, the historical determinism of two obscure Marxists is being realised. Smashing everything to instil a new world order is the means-to-an-end method of oligarch George Soros, who is bent on destroying the nation state, using Muslims and other immigrants as foot-soldiers. . .
Common Purpose
Most of the ruling class in Western society portray themselves in the virtuous terms of ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’ and ‘inclusive’. Since the 1960s a new establishment was formed, as conservatism was banished and radical ideologues marched through the institutions of education, media, politics, healthcare, law, policing, armed services, the arts, advertising industry and commercial headquarters. From the civil service to the Church of England, a new establishment has been forged. Nobody prospers unless they express the warped values of progressivism (i.e. Woke). Anyone speaking out will be ostracised (as Jim Ratcliffe is finding).
Common Purpose is a shadowy international organisation that trains leaders to work across boundaries and to ‘lead beyond authority’, thus bypassing due process and democracy. It selects trainees with a proclivity for challenging tradition and social norms. The training features neurolinguistic programming, which uses language as a tool to rewire thinking and mould consensus. Common Purpose would not identify itself as Cultural Marxist, but it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The senior ranks of the police are dominated by Common Purpose alumni; explaining the often controversial stances taken by forces in policing favourably for ethnic minorities and against the ordinary people.
The native stock of this land is falling off a cliff due to a hopeless birth rate and the profound impact of cultural demoralisation and discrimination. As Ratcliffe said, this feels like colonisation by immigrants, who change the sight, sound and smell of our towns with their religious garb, foreign languages and their spice and ghee. But ultimately, they are not to blame. Demographic replacement is a traison des clercs, and the government and civil service are the real people trafficking gang.
