Opinion: The United Kingdoms managed decline & understanding governments

Thank you to the Truth Reporter for submitting this article to Unity News Network (UNN)

Managed Decline – Understanding governments.

If you’re a viewer of UNN broadcasts then you’ll have heard the term ‘managed decline’ used several times.  Today I’d like to offer a full and detailed examination of what that term means, what it means for us as a population and for the individual. 

If you haven’t read my articles on the fiat money system then it would assist greatly in this discussion if you did, the links have been provided below for your convenience. 

So – managed decline, what is it?

We all know stories about people who live beyond their means, running up debts in order to do so and then they get made bankrupt – in these cases it is easy to identify that person no longer has an expensive car or designer clothing but what about when an entire society lives beyond its means?

Way back in 1971 President Nixon ended the convertibility of the dollar to gold in an event that has become known as the ‘Nixon Shock’. Prior to that, in theory every dollar printed was backed by gold stored in Fort Knox. Running a gold standard is not easy, it brings with it disciplines that central bankers today would cringe at having to obey. Today’s monetary system is, as I’ve explained before, largely an illusion. It works because so far the system has managed to convince most people that the illusion is real but there are real cracks beginning to open up in this tissue of lies and the elites do not like it one bit.

So what has the globalised financial system done wrong? – Essentially they have invented wealth that does not exist.  If you were to cash in all the value of shares on world stock exchanges, derivatives and other esoteric investment vehicles then you have more ‘money’ than there are things of any value to own – which makes having ‘money’ pretty pointless and this is where managed decline becomes a serious issue.

At the most basic level managed decline is a re-balancing between the theoretical wealth of the banking elites and the wealth we get to hold or spend ourselves. You can see the signs of this in everyday life if you look carefully. 

Food, houses and things you can’t live without get more expensive all the time but the latest trinkets (phones, cars – etc) are always pitched at a price so you can afford to buy them. This shows that the system needs its consumers to consume but actual assets (things of true value) need more and more ‘money’ to own.  

Secondly you’ll also see that the old are being harvested – or more accurately their wealth is being harvested. Governments increasingly want to recover the cost of care from elderly people by confiscating their wealth and also the system is constantly trying to convince senior citizens to cash in whatever money they have accumulated over a lifetime of work and spend it through equity release schemes. If you see any of the TV channels that are focused on the 50+ demographic you’ll see for yourself that there is a huge industry aimed at getting old people to give up their rights to their property.

The sad truth is that the system does not like to lose, they know full well that things like houses and gold bullion store value over time. They also know that the true value of their fictional ‘assets’ like currency, stocks and bonds is questionable at the very least. If they can convince you to exchange your things of value for their currency which you then spend on trinkets, the system will survive just a bit longer and this is their one and only concern – survival.

Here’s where the politicians come in, they are the mediators and the gatekeepers, the people at the top are let into these secrets about fiat money and the fragility of the system – how quickly they change their tunes when they understand the reality of the fraudulent fiat currency system. In turn politics becomes complicit with the fiat money matrix and policy more and more becomes not about making people prosperous but making sure you are slowly and surely herded into the system where you swap what you own for what you need. 

When David Clews contrasts Tory and Labour in terms of ‘managed decline’ he’s spot on. The Tories used to be the party of liberty, private property rights and free enterprise but that was before the corrupt markets inflated fictional wealth so much that the only way forward is to stealthily funnel all those products of people’s work back into the system so it can live just a little longer.  Of course, all the nice things you used to get from the government in return for the taxes they levy will become ever more scarce and hard to qualify for as the value of the fictional ‘money’ they claim from us becomes ever more diluted. 

Sadly Labour seems not to have bothered to learn any economics, to expose all the inadequacies of their understanding of macroeconomic principles would take another two articles to even scratch the surface of their innumeracy but safe to say to give the system in its current state to a Marxist with such a poor understanding of basic monetary issues would bring the system down very quickly indeed. What can be said with almost total certainty is that Labour will sequestrate, confiscate or tax assets at a rate previously unseen in the political history of the UK. They will effectively open up a bottomless chasm of spending and then throw everything you have down that hole to fill it – even when they know that it is a futile endeavour. 

I’m sorry if this sounds a tad bleak, this is largely because it is. Please re-read the second half of Part 2 of ‘The invisible cage’ – there are still ways to preserve your wealth if you are prepared to understand the system is not designed for your benefit and breaking free requires some hard choices, but it can be done….

The invisible cage – A fraud so audacious you won’t believe it exists.

The invisible cage : Part 2 – Here’s a pair of wire cutters