The terms “red pill” and “blue pill” refer to a choice between the willingness to learn a potentially unsettling or life-changing truth, by taking the red pill, or remaining in contented ignorance with the blue pill. The terms refer to a scene in the 1999 film The Matrix.
For those of us brave enough to have taken the red pill (a growing number during the covid era), the techniques being used by Government, Ministers, their “expert advisors” and mainstream media are transparent. It is often difficult to understand how friends, family and work colleagues cannot see the manipulation and pure deception being deployed.
The “blue pilled” will say “but that doesn’t make any sense” yet continue to dutifully obey the rules set for them by authority. Their belief in “the system” holds firm despite the niggling doubts as the goal posts are continually moved.
During the “covid pandemic” we have witnessed the formation of a formidable relationship between Government/Academia/Media/Big Pharma/and Public/Private Partnerships working in perfect lockstep setting and controlling the narrative.
Could this mighty beast override long held human rights/civil liberties and freedoms?
This question has now been answered with the emerging threat of forced vaccination and vax passports required to function within society looming large on the horizon. Going back just a couple of years this scenario would have been ridiculed and firmly placed in the “conspiracy theory box”.
Where are the normally vocal human rights lawyers – the silence is deafening.
Do you, like me, find it terrifying how successful the 24/7 propaganda “fear” campaign alongside Applied Psychology/NLP techniques have been – it is almost like a “spell has been cast over a mass of the population.”
How could this happen in modern day Britain?
The words of Graham Hancock in his video – “So threatened by the Truth” went some way to answer this question . He explains how “the system” works within the world of academia…. https://youtu.be/3WLS6q8Dlpw
Except of transcript…(not verbatim)
“From an academics point of view let’s say a Professor of Archaeology they have invested their whole career in a particular model of the past that model was already set when they went into the profession so from the very moment they start doing their first exams at university a filter is being applied. If they are in any way outside of the accepted teaching, if they are suggesting that things are not as they are taught then they will not pass those exams or they will not do well. [or they may not obtain funding]
In order to do well you have to buy into the existing model because if you don’t buy into that model your paper will be marked down and you will not get the results that could eventually lead you to becoming an academic. So their careers are invested in that model – they believe passionately that they are right and that this is how it is. [Group think].
When those ideas are challenged it’s not just an intellectual discussion any more it is as an attack on that person. I think that is fundamentally why academics reacted to me in the way that they did.
Attacking/Discrediting Critical Thinking
I was arguing that the whole field of history and archaeology may have got the origins of civilisation completely wrong, but many academics took it as a direct attack on them and their place in the world and that resulted in a counter-attack on me. The attacks on me would never have happened if my book (Finger Prints of the Gods) had been a failure.
There are lots of books of alternative history but most don’t appear above the radar. This one did and as a result there was a concerted effort made to discredit me.
When you have academics who write to the BBC and say “you must bring this man down”, when they actually say that and the BBC makes a program which is designed to damage my reputation and that program is then later found to have been unfair by the Broadcasting Standards Commission then something odd is going on. Something a little bit to do with reality control is happening there.
TED Talks – Censorship
In January 2013 I did a TedX event with Rupert Sheldrake, Satish Kumar, a bunch of other people were there, we all gave talks but 2 weeks later TED removed both my and Rupert Sheldrake’ talks.
There followed a fuss about this people wanted to know why, TED said because these were “pseudo-scientific ideas”. They never justified or supported that contention, they accused us of representing ideas about consciousness which were not “scientific”.
They took our talks offline not because they were unscientific but because they challenged a dogma of a particular faction of science. There followed a backlash from many scientists. TED were forced to put the talks back on their main site and publish the reasons why – a very humiliating climbdown.
In 2015 I appeared at another TED talk and lo and behold after 2 weeks they stuck a health warning on it saying, this is not politically correct, this is not sanctioned authorised science. “
Analysis
So there you have it – this is how the system works within our Institutions – if you dare to challenge the “accepted order” consequences will follow.
How many times during this “pandemic” have we heard “we have to follow the science” [but only one side is allowed to be heard]. Anyone with alternative views who gathers any sort of influence has been smeared/defamed and ultimately destroyed.
The oppressive disproportionate response from the State during the past 17 months has been something to behold never have we witnessed anything like it. Psychological warfare has been waged.
The SAGE minutes released under Order of the Court should have been a wake-up call to us all.
No image better portrays the depth of despair to which so many people have fallen under the brutal “lockdown regime” than this one…..Truly heart-breaking.
Ask yourself what sort of legacy do I want to leave to my children/ grandchildren and future generations.
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/does-the-handling-of-this-virus-amount-to-torture/
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/vaccinating-kids-for-covid-19-is-it-a-dangerous-gamble/
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/watch-neil-oliver-says-the-government-should-leave-our-kids-alone/
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/making-kids-wear-facemasks-in-school-is-child-abuse/
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/parents-send-kids-masks-to-a-lab-the-results-are-shocking/
I wrote my first article for Unity News Network on 30th December 2019, and I have been writing ever since – my library is now well in excess of 200 articles.
Alternative media is essential in these times of unprecedented censorship and mainstream bias, which has ramped up exponentially during the past 2 years. The overton window of “acceptable opinion” is growing every narrower.
Having a citizen’s log, cataloguing the twists and turns of life during these turbulent times is essential.
Thank you Unity News Network for allowing me a voice on your platform.
