fbpx

World Health Organisation deems your Child’s Presence in School as Informed Consent to Vaccinate Them

Advertisements

On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared pandemic status for COVID-19.  Governments responded by implementing unprecedented “lockdown” measures globally with no clear exit strategy apart from the stated goal of rapidly developing a vaccine.   But will that vaccine become compulsory?

Vaccine Mandates Violate the Right to Informed Consent

Advertisements

Compulsory vaccination violates the right to informed consent, one of the most fundamental ethics in medicine and a human right recognised under international law, including the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights of 2005, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol of 2006 and under internationally recognized agreements such as the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects of 2002, and the World Medical Association Declaration Of Helsinki of 1964, revised in 2013.

The United Nations (UN) and WHO are legally obligated to uphold the right to informed consent yet have been complicit in violating it.

The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) praised the Maldives government for passing a law in November 2019 that effectively outlawed the exercise of the right to informed consent by threatening parents with prosecution for non-compliance with public vaccine policy.

In January 2020, two articles in The BMJ (formerly British Medical Journal) revealed that the WHO had been sponsoring a malaria vaccine trial that included 720,000 children in three African countries without having ensured that the prior informed consent of the parents had been obtained. Most egregiously, parents had not been informed that earlier trials had found the vaccine to be associated with an increased risk of childhood mortality, particularly among girls.

While the vaccine may protect against the target diseases, it appears to detrimentally affect the immune system in a way that makes children more vulnerable to other diseases. This “non-specific effect” has been found to be true for non-live vaccine generally

WHO is aware of the evidence, but has dismissed it on the grounds that it comes from observational studies, which are prone to selection bias.  However, it accepts the findings of observational studies showing beneficial non-specific effects of measles vaccination (double standards it would seem).

Additionally, the members of the WHO committee tasked with reviewing the evidence had conflicts of interest, including three having ties to GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), one of the manufacturers of DTP vaccines and the manufacturer of the experimental malaria vaccine.

The WHO also receives funding from vaccine manufacturers, including GSK, Sanofi, and Merck. The single largest source of funding for WHO presently is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which promotes vaccines while holding investments in vaccine manufacturers.

The public is repeatedly assured by public health officials and the media that “vaccines are safe and effective”, but in the absence of randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing long-term health outcomes, including mortality, between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, that statement is not justifiable. 

In one of my earlier articles I outlined a study which found having a flu vaccine annually could increase the risk of infection with novel influenza strains, as well as with non-influenza viruses, in part due to the lost opportunity to acquire the cross-protective, cell-mediated immunity conferred by infection.

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/military-study-finds-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-risk-by-36/

A related hypothesis is that of “antibody dependent enhancement” (ADE), whereby vaccine-induced antibodies, instead of protecting the individual from subsequent infection, enhance the infection and thereby increase the risk of severe disease.

Attempts to develop a vaccine for SARS were impeded by this phenomenon, whereby vaccinated animals were found to be at increased risk of viral infection. This past experience has raised concerns about the potential for ADE with vaccines under development for SARS-CoV-2 – (So I believe the animal experimentation stage is being omitted on this occasion).

All vaccines carry risks. Compulsory vaccination constitutes a gross violation of the right to informed consent.

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/government-responds-to-petition-prevent-any-restrictions-on-those-who-refuse-a-covid-19-vaccination/

Analysis

No one ever has any right to tell anyone else what to do. But nor does anyone ever have the right to cause any harm or loss to another human being.  It is our duty to ensure the State do not have the right to exercise unfettered control over our families – especially our children – to all parents please be aware of the “implied consent process”.

It is vital that we continue to live in a voluntary society – this would be a society without authoritarian rulers, not a society without rules.

https://www.who.int/immunization/programmes_systems/policies_strategies/consent_note_en.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1IUKIk-EJ6GFtbkAi32QC0uDYWgRJbVpnRym_Qq3-CwciuIr9v80Xgkn8

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2019/11/23/who-now-deems-your-childs-presence-in-school-as-informed-consent-to-vaccinate-them-its-called-implied-consent/

https://www.technocracy.news/the-un-ignores-ngos-warnings-about-mandated-vaccines/

https://www.who.int/immunization/programmes_systems/policies_strategies/consent_note_en.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1IUKIk-EJ6GFtbkAi32QC0uDYWgRJbVpnRym_Qq3-CwciuIr9v80Xgkn8

Leave a Reply

-->
>