Gillian Jamieson

Chris Newton

To all Members of House of Commons An Open Letter

 

Dear MP,

We are writing in our capacity as psychotherapist and as molecular biologist working in immuno-metabolism to express our concerns about child vaccination and the persistent narrative that the vaccines are “safe and effective.”

Why would any rational and caring adult allow the injection of a child with a vaccine that is in children’s clinical trials until 2026 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643) and that is authorised for emergency use only? This is especially irrational at a time when infections pose negligible risk to most people and certainly not to children, with their robust im mune systems.

You might respond that the offer to allow the vaccination 5 to 11 years old, is not mandatory and indeed the offer appears non-coercive, but it is our strong opinion that parents must not be left to make this decision, as they cannot give truly informed consent for the following reasons:

1. The Government has striven to provide vaccines as the only “way out of this pandemic”. This is despite the fact that early medical intervention (even during the phases of more virulent virus infections) with re-purposed compounds, has proved most efficacious in the hands of physicians, such as Dr Shankara Chetty, Dr Vladimir Zelenko, Dr Peter McCullough, to mention but three high profile figures (Dr Shankara Chetty has treated over 10,000 patients for COVID-19 and not lost one to the disease). As a collective of highly experienced physicians, the Front Line Covid Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance have published their highly successful COVID-19 protocols for early and ICU therapy (https://covid19criticalcare.com/).

Despite the overwhelming evidence that COVID-19 is a highly treatable disease, the collective mindset was established by Government that vaccines are the only tool available and therefore they are invested in the idea that they are “safe and effective”. Despite much higher rates of deaths than previous vaccines, they still maintain that they are safe and effective. Most MPs praise the efficient roll-out of vaccines as a triumph for this country.

1. The idea that the vaccines are safe and effective has political advantage. Any evidence that they are not, has been quashed, both by Government and mainstream media. This means the public is entirely ill-informed. In addition, the general populace is still in a state of fear about the danger posed by Covid-19, due to intense Government advertising of misleading information, such as that about asymptomatic spread and due to the coercion used to achieve a high uptake of the vaccine. Some call this fear-mongering. Others call it government propaganda. It continues even now, and nothing has been done to undo the damage caused both to medical understanding and mental health. Thus, the public is still prone to see the vaccines as positive or a necessary evil and has not heard any robust discussion of the pros and cons.
   
2. The medical truth about the vaccines is entirely different to the political one. There is no medium or long-term safety data. This basic fact simply cannot be refuted, though it has been covered up. An MP we know, complained during a meeting that constituents had referred to it as “experimental”. He seemed to be completely unaware that a vaccine still in clinical trials, is indeed experimental. Indeed, the death rate for these vaccines is much higher than for previous vaccines, as explained in the attached letter from an epidemiologist to the Vaccines Minister. This rate of death is despite an increased level of under-reporting due to political will exerted through non-medical NHS CEO’s (anecdotal). On the other hand, Covid deaths in 2021 did not increase excess mortality, so was nothing exceptional.

Not a normal vaccine

The Covid vaccine is radically different to vaccines against polio and smallpox for example. Traditional vaccines, introduce the disease itself as a live virus or in a functionally limited whole live virus form or as protein subunits. This stimulates both the innate and adaptive immune system. The current, so called vaccines, introduce genetic material via mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) or as a DNA adenovirus vector (AstraZeneca) that has code to instruct human cells to make the spike protein. The injection is made into muscle, and it is now known that the nucleic acid code material is not confined to the site of injection. Postmortem tissue studies of deceased individuals, some months after vaccination, show spike protein, lymphocyte invasion and vascular destruction in organs throughout the body, including for example, the spleen, the heart, the liver, the kidney, the ovary, the thyroid gland, the salivary gland and the dura mata (outer layer of meninges covering of the brain). These observations are consistent with an autoimmune attack on tissues expressing spike protein.

Many might believe that because the mRNA technology has been studied for a number of years, it must be safe. However, it has never before been used for a vaccine deployed in a very large human population. This makes it a brand new technology, with far too little safety data. Indeed, the mRNA and adenoviral technology should not be classified as a vaccine, rather it should come under the regulations for gene therapy. Each cell that takes up the nucleic acid code will express spike protein in a way that is completely uncontrolled, often giving very high levels of spike that is released to bind to the surface of the producing cell and other cells in the vicinity. Spike protein has also been found to be transported around the body by exosomes. These can be delivered to the brain where the spike protein may lodge for many years, acting, as some suspect, as a prion-type protein.

It must be highlighted that an intramuscular route of vaccine administration cannot produce sterilising immunity and so it will not prevent infection and transmission.

Deaths and adverse events

Both anecdotally and in the various adverse event reporting systems (VAERS, Yellow Card, EudraVigilance), it has been shown that this injection is causing death and serious adverse events on a much greater scale than any previous vaccines. In the UK, 2000 deaths have been reported, but due to under-reporting, this figure is realistically likely to be very much higher.

There are now studies showing that the injection may, amongst other things:

1. damage the immune system, including resistance to cancer: https://www.authorea.com/ users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna- vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
2. adversely affect menstruation and fertility: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eu-investigates-reports- menstrual-disorders-after-mrna-covid-shots-2022-02-11/
3. cause myocarditis in younger men: https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/doi/10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA/477788/ Autopsy-Histopathologic-Cardiac-Findings-in-Two

Possible long term effects

Never before in history, have children been sacrificed on the high altar of public health for ‘the greater good’ based on the faulty premise that these vaccines will prevent infection and transmission. Worse still, we have absolutely no idea what the long term effects of vaccination with these experimental products will be. A clear red flag in this respect is the known cellular signalling ability and toxicity of the vaccine-encoded spike protein, its molecular similarity to human and microorganism proteins and its similarity to prion proteins. Given the continued booster vaccination of large populations, we should expect overall health to diminish over the coming years, due to increased prevalence of autoimmune conditions, cardiovascular conditions, serious neurological conditions (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS/motor neurone disease) etc.), cancer and reproductive failure. These effects are quite apart from those of the various carrier substances and adjuvants within the vaccine preparations. These too are toxic and will have long term consequences.

In conclusion, the general public is very slowly realising the damage caused by the injections (see Conservative Woman article below). If their children are hurt, because they have faith in government, there will be political upheaval on a very substantial scale. US VAERS data, which includes details such as age, shows that children and young adults have died. This will already be a consequence in the UK for older children. The same will become apparent for the 5-11 age group.

In our opinion it is criminal to continue the vaccination process, not just for children and young adults, but for most of the population who have little risk from the disease. The only populations where vaccination might be justified are the very old or persons with multiple comorbidities or both.

There is an abundance of scientific and clinical data to show that these vaccines are not safe for children and indeed young adults (and older adults). We have presented just a small sample of this evidence here. As Members of the House of Commons and indeed Government, you will be held personally responsible for all harms caused by administration of these vaccines.

Gillian Jamieson, MA Hons, PGCE, PGDip, MBACP

Dr Chris Newton, PhD. MPhil, BSc

Center for Immuno-metabolism, Microbiome and Bio-Energetic Research.

Member of Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART),

Children’s  Covid Vaccine Advisory Group (CCVAG) and Vaccine Injury Research Initiative (VIRI) Email: chris.newton@me.com

 

Recent articles in support of this email:

 

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/bribery-and-coercion-how-jabs-are-being-forced- on-children/

 

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/02/17/first-do-no-harm-unintended-consequences-of- vaccinating-children-against-covid-19/

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/02/17/this-evidence-free-jcvi-advice-to-vaccinate-five-to-11- year-olds-will-live-in-infamy/