I am starting to notice a pattern emerging around the actions taken by medical journals which I believe is worthy of closer investigation.
Could prestigious medical journals have become part of a wider “Medical Industrial Complex”? Are they acting independently and with integrity or being held captive by powerful vested interests? Time to delve deeper.
Hydroxychloroquine
I have previously written articles surrounding the politicisation of Hydroxychloroquine, which included the publication in the prestigious Lancet Medical Journal of a “fake medical study”.
Despite the retraction by the Lancet the use of Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic treatment for Covid was effectively “killed off” the damage was done.
Question is how did a purportedly peer reviewed paper get published by the Lancet based upon fake data? https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/have-big-tech/
Then, more recently, there was this……
Face Masks
The researchers behind a large Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask encountered great difficulty in getting their research results published.
the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA“ all said no.”
The study, showed the difference in infection rate through mask wearing was negligible was this report wilfully supressed as the outcome did not fit the political narrative? https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/3-top-medical-journals-refuse-to-publish-landmark-danish-mask-study/
And now there is the Ivermectin story…..
Ivermectin is a cheap and safe drug, used all over the world. It is widely used against parasites. It cuts Covid infections, hospitalisations and deaths by about 75%, a study shows. More than 30 trials across the world found that Ivermectin causes ‘repeated, consistent, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes’ at all stages of the disease.
An earlier study by Professor Andrew Hill of Liverpool University also concluded that Ivermectin cuts death rates by around three-quarters.
Dr Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, convened an online summit of international experts to discuss the new data. It included evidence that widespread use of ivermectin in parts of India and South America has led to a big reduction in infections and deaths.
Dr Lawrie submitted a 97-page report to the World Health Organisation (for whom she has previously worked providing meta-analysis on scientific studies), urging it immediately to recommend Ivermectin to treat Covid.
An excellent interview was conducted by Independent Journalist Anna Brees which included Senior Daily Mail Journalist David Rose, Dr Tess Lawrie & Dr Pierre Kory – 1 March 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP36UgVjMPk&t=2295s
All 3 interviewees admitted they did not understand why this treatment was not being looked at or reported upon – the number of studies and the success it was having in both prevention and treatment of covid-19 was very compelling.
Dr Lawrie told of her struggle to get anyone to engage on the “Ivermectin story” – only David Rose from the Daily Mail and David Davis MP had shown any interest.
Ivermectin Studies not being Published by Medical Journals
A peer-reviewed study, was set to be published in the US journal Frontiers of Pharmacology.
Dr Lawrie said there is something remarkable happening there are a whole lot of studies sitting on the pre-publication website. Researchers are having great difficulty getting their studies published. What has happened with Dr Kory’s study is absolutely shocking I have never ever heard of an article being held after it has gone through peer review, been accepted, the proofs have been signed off, it has been copy edited about to be posted but then held. There is something very very fishy going on and very powerful people or organisations are preventing the news on Ivermectin coming out.
When asked by Anna are you absolutely sure Ivermectin saves lives. Dr Lawrie responded without hesitation “yes I am, substantially – it substantially saves lives – it will substantially reduce the impact on our hospital services, it will substantially protect our health workers and other frontline people from being infected it is an absolute scandal that it is not available.”
Analysis
These are just 3 of the cases that I have come across during my investigations for articles surrounding the covid-19 issue where Medical Journals do not appear to be acting in the way perhaps one would expect.
Have the Journals become politicised?
Are powerful vested interests vetting what can and cannot get published in these journals depending on what outcome they desire?
I cannot answer that with any certainty but one thing I do know is that “he who pays the piper calls the tune”.
Follow the money.
I wrote my first article for Unity News Network on 30th December 2019, and I have been writing ever since – my library is now well in excess of 200 articles.
Alternative media is essential in these times of unprecedented censorship and mainstream bias, which has ramped up exponentially during the past 2 years. The overton window of “acceptable opinion” is growing every narrower.
Having a citizen’s log, cataloguing the twists and turns of life during these turbulent times is essential.
Thank you Unity News Network for allowing me a voice on your platform.
