Discrepancy in the Green Book, and how to get scaredy-cat GPs back to work

Tom Penn writes at:

www.neoconscription.wordpress.com

Twitter: @NeoConscription 

When Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty announced September 13 that children shall, in spite of the JCVI’s decision, be eligible (read eligible for coercion) for vaccination against Covid-19, Public Health England’s guidebook for vaccines and vaccination protocol (the Green Book, chapter 14a) at the time stated:

‘Children under 16 years of age, even if they are CEV [clinically extremely vulnerable], are at low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, and, given the absence of safety and efficacy data on the vaccine, are not recommended for vaccination.’ (Page 24)

Now known as the UK Health Security Agency, the updated Green Book (equivalent paragraph now on page 26) omits altogether that recommendation, yet fails to provide any accompanying update to the safety evaluation of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine. The issue of the ‘absence of safety and efficacy data’ as it relates to the under 16 cohort has simply been erased, and replaced with Whitty’s recommendation that vaccination shall regardless ‘help avoid school absences and disruption to face-to-face education.’

The Green Book is supposedly an important piece of public health literature, produced by Government bodies and to be adhered to by medical practitioners for the protection of the public. That it now officially contains provision for a biological vaccination of children against school absence is disturbing to say the least. Needless to say no such provision exists for the MMR vaccine.

A dangerous precedent has been set, one in which the State can now experiment with the boundaries of what is fast becoming an accepted form of governance underpinned by a condescending and tyrannical ‘only we know what is best for your health’ style philosophy: a method whereby the public are encouraged to mass-medicate themselves against the invented psychological and sociological problems delivered via the Trojan horse of an equally invented, or inflated, biological threat. In short, ‘approved’ authoritarian quackery.

The bulk of the UK healthcare sector, and GPs in particular, appear to find nothing sinister about this at all. On a macro level yes, there are various alliances of healthcare professionals pushing back, and long may they continue to do so, but it is on a micro level that we really should have witnessed a little more vocal resistance from our GPs by now.    

Perhaps it is time therefore, to administer an alternative political-placebo similar in nature to that currently being forced onto children, but this time onto double-jabbed GPs still too frightened or lazy to return to work (the vaccine’s inefficacy in this nevertheless counterfeit emergency notwithstanding). After all, they, unlike youngsters missing school due to obsessive-compulsive testing protocols and not fear, are missing out on a far greater amount of learning due to fear alone. Surely then, it is GPs Secretaries of State should be seeking to cure: they are the very definition of the Nudge Unit’s ‘strong compliers’ requiring support to reintegrate back into society.

Hence I propose an innovative new immunisation programme called the Role-Reversal Rollout (RRR), which shall tackle both the terror and greedy torpor currently running rampant amongst the GP cohort.

Any child who finds themselves home from school as consequence of the State’s Test and Trace truancy initiative, shall temporarily assume the role of online GP, whereby, and already master Google-searchers, they shall work on processing the NHS backlog: NHS chiefs after all, more than happy of late to imply via their ‘terror’ of the pre-pandemic work format, that the duties of a GP can be effectively executed at home regardless.

Any gutless GP contentedly resisting this return to the pre-pandemic format shall be subjected, as has now become the norm in the school-age cohort, to inclusion on Chris Whitty’s State Happiness Index, and a randomly selected vaccine-injury-equivalent meted out to each.

This latter aspect of the RRR shall involve the temporary reinstatement of Matt Hancock, a man fully qualified in the merciless dispensation of pain and misery: Chris Whitty himself being too busy at the moment overseeing the progressive censorship of his agency’s vaccine surveillance statistics. It is unfortunate but there will likely be many fatalities; their numbers to be added to what appears to be an MHRA Yellow Card Karmic Retribution Scheme. 

Injured GPs shall then attempt to navigate the Covid Crystal-Maze that has become the healthcare sector in search of prompt treatment for their maladies, upon which they will quickly understand the crippling consequences to the public their pathogenic cowardice causes, and with tails and also perhaps catheter bags between legs, shall resume the work they once swore to uphold irrespective of public health emergencies, without further complaint.

After which, every single citizen to a man shall doorstep-clap every evening for 20 months the courage of the nation’s children in having withstood as best their paltry defences allowed, the privations imposed upon their impressionable shoulders since March 2020; with each child receiving a compensation payment of £100k from savings accrued via a 50 per cent cut to GP salaries.

Professor Neil Ferguson shall be in charge of forecasting the RRR uptake and its impact on Quality-Adjusted Life Years lost, and just for once, shall find his model to be in the minus figures, and not plus 20 trillion.