Unsurprisingly, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Advisory Committee voted unanimously to greenlight Pfizer’s Covid shot for children ages 5 to 11, despite strong objections raised during the meeting by multiple scientists and physicians.
I, for my sins, tuned in to the live stream of the “slideshow presentation/vote” – but the longer I listened the sicker I felt – this appeared to be nothing more than a group of “Big Pharma groupies” who, for whatever reason, could not or would not say NO to greenlighting this novel experimental technology – whatever the cost to children’s health.
Before the shots can be rolled out, the FDA will have to formally authorise the “vaccine” (gene therapy), and the CDC must also weigh in with its own recommendations — but the Biden regime have already announced that it has ordered 68m doses of the “pediatric vaccine” meaning we can expect to see Pfizer’s request once again sail through.
Time to look at some of the “shock points/red flags” which should have seen this “experimental product” vetoed.
Dr Cody Meissner (Yes vote) stated:-
“The issue is side effects or adverse events that might be occurring after this “vaccine” and I am torn on one hand we know that many mothers and fathers are eager to administer this “vaccine” to children because they are so frightened, perhaps overly so, but they are so nervous because of what has been stated, they really are anticipating having access to this “vaccine”.
On the other hand we saw that approximately 68% of the children who are hospitalised with Covid-19 shared comorbidities that means about 32% do not and then if we were to take 40% of that group that may have immunity already we are getting down to a very small percentage of otherwise healthy 5-11 year old children who might derive some benefit, and we simply don’t know what the side effects are going to be.
It is not clear that this “vaccine” will reduce rates of transmission, we are hoping that is the case but we just don’t know. This “vaccine” is probably not going to prevent infection it is going to prevent severe disease.
My worry is that this vaccine should be available to those parents who are very eager to get it for their child because their child has a comorbidity or they are concerned themselves.
I am just worried that if we say yes, the state are going to mandate the administration of this vaccine to children in order to go to school, and I do not agree with that, I think that would be an error at this time until we get more information about the safety.”
Dr Michael Kurill, (abstained from voting) stated:-
“While the benefit is assumed to be prevention of severe disease which is what we are all hoping for, the one concern I have is that particularly for that population of children that has experienced a previous “covid” infection, which CDC estimates is 40% of this population, which I think is probably a flaw – I believe it may actually be higher than that – the question really becomes does this “vaccine” offer any benefits to them at all?, are they actually very well protected.
The other aspect here is for children who have undergone a delta infection, does now vaccinating them with a strain that goes back almost 2 years from the time they are getting the vaccine actually help or hurt their current immune system with regard to ongoing variants. I don’t think we know that, we have no idea.
I think for many children who have experienced covid already they are probably more than adequately protected. I think for the high-risk children it is very different.
I will emphasise again that this dosing interval, the way it was put together, is sub-optimal in terms of durability and I think that there can’t be any expectation that the antibody decay rate is going to look any different from the adults, these children are going to be expected to have a booster in 6 months time.
The focus on reducing cases is really what is going to confound us because I don’t think we are going to be able to do that, we are going to see “vaccine breakthrough cases” and it is going to cause all the same problems covid does whether or not they are vaccinated.
Myocarditis
Dr Eric Rubin (Editor-in-Chief, The New England Journal of Medicine) asks Myocarditis expert Dr Matthew Oster…..
“You were comparing classic myocarditis and its outcomes and what may be happening with vaccine induced myocarditis” – what do we know from the small amount of biopsy and pathology material from the cases in children that might tell us anything from the underlying mechanism that may make us more comfortable with the prediction you can make from classic myocarditis.”
Response “I wish I could give you a good answer to that, but what I can tell you is that of the about 800 or so myocarditis cases I think 1 or 2 have actually had biopsies – so unfortunately I can’t.” – [WHAT?!]
[Despite not being able to bring comfort to this “esteemed panel” about this serious – (and not so rare) vaccine adverse reaction in children – they all still voted YES – is this not a criminal act?].
Scroll to 15 mins 23 https://thehighwire.com/videos/despite-lack-of-data-fda-panel-oks-covid-shot-for-kids/
My Final Thoughts
The question I would now ask all parents is – DO YOU STILL TRUST THE SCIENCE?
Are you happy with the way “experts” decide the future health of your children?
Takes me back to a movie I once watched………..
Are you prepared to let the “experts” play Russian Roulette with your child’s health – “WELL ARE YA”?
I wrote my first article for Unity News Network on 30th December 2019, and I have been writing ever since – my library is now well in excess of 200 articles.
Alternative media is essential in these times of unprecedented censorship and mainstream bias, which has ramped up exponentially during the past 2 years. The overton window of “acceptable opinion” is growing every narrower.
Having a citizen’s log, cataloguing the twists and turns of life during these turbulent times is essential.
Thank you Unity News Network for allowing me a voice on your platform.
