From terrorism to viral contagion: how crises are exploited to pursue a New World Order

Niall McCrae

For the proponents of world government, a good crisis is never wasted. Indeed, terrorism, climate change and now covid-19 have all been such a boon to globalists that one may suspect some contrivance. For many years the likes of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation have warned of a devastating pandemic, but was this not only predicted, but planned?  

Few readers may have heard of Moral Re-Armament and its founder Frank Buchman. About twenty years ago, I visited its conference centre at Caux, overlooking Lake Geneva, with my sister-in-law (she worked at the UN in Geneva, nearby Moral Re-Armament’s Swiss head office).  It was a fascinating insight into how well-intended but grandiose men try to remould humanity.

Born in Pennsylvania, Buchman (1878-1961) was a disillusioned Lutheran priest who experienced a spiritual reawakening on hearing a woman preach at the Keswick Convention in England in 1908.  Perceiving civilisation in imminent danger of collapse, Buchman began a movement for world reconstruction, with the mantra of ‘absolute honesty, absolute purity, absolute unselfishness and absolute love’. 

Established in 1938 in East Ham, Essex, Moral Re-Armament had a recruiting sergeant in the Second World War. After Buchman’s death the organisation was led by journalist Peter Howard until he also died in 1966. Moral Re-Armament evolved from a Christian-inspired practical mission into a rigid hierarchy, topped by men in suits engaging in international diplomacy (hence the title of ex-member Roger Watson’s 1987 pamphlet The Salvation Army in Dinner Jackets). 

Undoubtedly Moral Re-Armament played a role in quelling the spread of communism in post-war Europe. ‘The choice for all men everywhere’, Buchman asserted, was ‘Moral Re-Armament or communism’. Buchman actively supported Jean Monnet’s vision of a united Europe. As well as eschewing national borders, syncretism was prominent in the Moral Re-Armament agenda. Like the Quakers and the Freemasons it promoted a brotherhood of man, transcending religious doctrines. Many liberal Catholics were lured from Rome to Caux. 

The policy of keeping all doors open degenerated into moral relativism, as Moral Re-Armament drew equivalences between communism and Christianity, and between the liberal West and authoritarian East. This tendency was exploited by regimes such as the Chinese Communist Party, who saw Moral Re-Armament as a means of influence. 

The organisation became almost as secretive as the Freemasons, with an elusive inner sanctum. Council meetings were held behind closed doors with minutes hard to come by, and dissent was suppressed. Any member who strayed from guidelines was expected to mend the error of his ways, or leave. Friendships outside were discouraged, except for recruitment purposes. Watson and wife Debbie participated in Moral Re-Armament from 1982 to 1987, but left after they asked too many questions and got too few answers.  

The Watsons, while in Paris, went to the Moral Re-Armament base at Bois du Boulogne in the suburbs. As they arrived a man was leaving in a hurry. A friend told the Watsons that this was Frits Philips, head of the Dutch business empire, and that he had been meeting representatives of Mossad and the Palestinian Liberation Organisation. Philips was also involved in the Bildeberg Group, and this led Roger Watson down the rabbit holes of conspiracy theory, from which he emerged with the conclusion that rather than theoretical conjecture, the conspirators were very real. 

Moral Re-Armament hosted get-togethers of the globalist elite. Round Table meetings were held at Caux, initiated by Frits Philips. Trilateral Commission member Andrew Young addressed the Moral Re-Armament conference in 1987. Like the Council on Foreign Relations, Aspen Institute of Humanistic Affairs, Chatham House and the World Economic Forum, all of these globalist bodies are working towards a post-nation, post-religion New World Order. 

After converting to Catholicism in 1987, Watson wrote several articles about the untoward influence of globalist ideology on the higher echelons of the church. Marxism had made inroads, particularly through liberation theology in Latin America. The current Pope is clearly in favour of moral and material globalisation, praising the work of UN bodies that promote activities in conflict with Christian faith such as abortion, divisive identity politics and gender fluidity. 

Why was Philips meeting the PLO, Watson wondered. He discovered that the International Labour Organisation, a UN agency, was funding terrorist movements such as the PLO. Such armed campaigns have always drawn sympathy from the Left, but why would a supposedly virtuous organisation for world peace bankroll violent insurrection? This led Watson to another question. Why were so many left-wing politicians, including from the Labour Party in Britain (Denis Healey, for example) associating with mega-capitalists and banking ‘masters of the universe’? 

A member of the Trilateral Commission, Sir Keir Starmer is on a long line of champagne socialists whose outlook reaches far beyond the lives of ordinary people in the provinces. After the electoral failure of Jeremy Corbyn, partly due to an extremely hostile media, Starmer was positioned as Labour leader to align the party with the centrist progressive policies of Tony Blair. As I have noted in previous UNN articles, instead of resisting the COVID-19 lockdown, Starmer has urged more draconian restrictions on livelihood and liberty, which disproportionately harm the very people that Labour was meant to represent. 

Globalists have advanced by gradually undermining forces for good such as faith, traditional family values, nationhood and democratic institutions. But sometimes they make great strides, exploiting crises such as war or famine. It is to their benefit that terrorism weakens nations. The overblown climate change emergency justifies global control of resources. Covid-19 has created conditions for worldwide surveillance through digital technology, such that I suspect a reverse order of planning: vaccine passports (already in development before the pandemic) needed a universal vaccine, which in turn would be necessitated by a virus. 

Now we are being warned of a global cyber-attack. Like Event 201, the desktop exercise in pandemic response held by the World Economic Forum just before covid-19 struck, a catastrophic internet shutdown is being gamed. This is entirely justifiable activity for national and international authorities and commercial organisations, who must be prepared for the worst. But as with covid-19, there is growing suspicion that crises are contrived for the purpose of technocratic world domination by an elite. 

Buchman was undoubtedly a good man. But the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Power attracts psychopathic people who have little care for the masses. Misanthropic ideas contaminate the mission for global harmony: eugenics, euthanasia and electronic tyranny. The public faces of globalisation such as Tony Blair, George Soros and Bill Gates are not the biggest threat; instead, it is the faceless figures off stage. The Illuminati, with their insignia ‘Novus Ordo Seclorum’ (new world order) are illuminated only to themselves.

-->