Dr Roz Savage, MBE, MP, introduces her first Parliamentary Petition for debate
By Anthony Webber:
A successful Parliamentary Petition on Geo-Engineering has been debated.
Roz Savage, the Liberal Democratic MP for South Cotswolds, introduced this, which was her first Parliamentary Petition for debate.
She was the Petitions Committee member who had volunteered to take on this responsibility
A lot of work went into bringing about the first UK Parliamentary debate on Geo-Engineering.
It started with Antoinette Taylor. She and her husband had been involved in truth and freedom issues for some time.
They had recently moved to Bkarenau Ffestiniog, Gwynedd.
She felt she had to do something about chem trails, an issue which had been concerning her, and deciding to start a Petition.
This resulted in her contacting the Parliamentary Petitions Committee and it all proceeded from then on.
The Petition was to make all forms of “geo-engineering” affecting the environment illegal.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/701963
The Petition started well but then slowed as they often do.
At this stage, Antoinette Taylor was contacted by Anthony Webber to offer to help take the petition forward to success.
A Petitions team was put together with Simone Plaut, a speaker on Geo-Engineering, being a key member.
The Petition managed to attract increasing attention and over a period of just a few weeks hit the 100,000 signatures required to qualify for debate.
There were zoom calls on the issue, with a range of people participating, including Matt Landman and Alex Klaushofer.
Prior to the debate, Dr Roz Savage had a zoom call with Antoinette Taylor, Anthony Webber and Simone Plaut.
This helped Roz Savage to be more prepared for her presentation of the Petition to Parliament.
When the debate date came, Antoinette could not attend it for health reasons, and she asked Anthony Webber and Simone Plaut to attend as her representatives.
A number of other campaigners also attended the debate.
Outside Parliament, campaigners had posters and gave out leaflets explaining the dangers of geo-engineering.
Over the weekend, there had been a major event in London where Matt Landman, Sonia Poulton and others spoke on the chem trails issue.
At the same time there were similar events in other parts of the country including a major one in North Wales organised by Ianto Jones.
The petition was presented to Parliament in Westminster Hall by Dr Roz Savage, MBE, MP.
The debate took place on Monday afternoon the 23rd June at 4.30pm.
Antoinette and her Petitions team said they were very pleased with what Dr Roz Savage said.
This was the first time there had been a Parliamentary debate on this subject, and it was an historic moment.
The issue of chem trails is now an issue which can be properly discussed, which is a major step forward.
Antoinette and colleagues are now working on new initiatives to campaign further on this issue.
One such issue is that the government may have given misleading information in the Parliamentary debate.
This includes official documentation that geo-engineering experiments are being funded by the government.
More on this when full analysis is undertaken, which will be reported back on.
The concern about the issue was reflected by the fact that160,631 signed the petition before it closed.
This was all achieved with nil help from mainstream media, despite the fact they were given the information.
The following is an email Anthony sent to Dr Roz Savage after the debate:
For the attention of Dr Roz Savage, MBE, MP
“Dear Roz
Thank you so much for giving your time and attention to our small petitions team on behalf of petitioner Antoinette Taylor.
We were most grateful for what you said, which was productive, positive, and persuasive.
Your efforts were very uplifting and inspirational.
It was an historic occasion as it was the first time there has been a proper debate on “geo-engineering.”
The gene is now out of the bottle so to speak, so hopefully it will not be too difficult to progress further on this issue now.
On this, your advice and leadership will be much appreciated.
We intend to evaluate what was said in the debate and would be grateful if we could continue to communicate with you on this.
It is so important to strike a consensus balance of working together to achieve net zero objectives without taking measures which could be counterproductive.
I have attached a photo of the three of us after the debate, myself, yourself, and Simone Plaut.
I thank you too, for taking us to the Strangers Bar, to enjoy good conversation and to meet some of your colleagues.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
With best wishes
Anthony
Anthony Webber
Political commentator and strategist.
Footnote:
Dr Savage invited Anthony Webber and Simone Plautfor a drink in Parliament’s “Strangers’ Bar” after the debate, where they discussed what could follow the petition.
They also met with the Chair of the Petitions Committee.
Attached photo of Anthony Webber with Dr Roz Savage, MBE, MP. and fellow team member Simone Plaut.
Also attached, photo of Antionette Taylor, the Petitioner.
Anthony Webber said that they were now analysing what was said in the debate and would be following up this with further pressure on the government.
He added: “Whatever views MP’s have on Net-Zero objectives, the spraying of chemicals in the sky can be very counterproductive to achieving such objectives, and needs to stop in all its forms, research purposes or otherwise.”
The Debate is available to view with transcript:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/701963#debate-threshold
The Debate was held on a not very busy Parliamentary Monday at 4.30pm.
However, that is not a major excuse for the attendance of just six MP’s plus the MP Chairing the Debate.
There were three Liberal Democrats including Dr. Roz Savage, two Labour including Energy Security and Net Zero Minister and one Conservative.
The Greens, Reform, Plaid and other smaller parties did themselves no credit by their absence.
Antionette did speak to her MP, Liz Saville Roberts, Paid Cymru, to ask her to attend, but she didn’t.
Kind regards
Anthony Webber
Political Commentator and Strategist
Opinions from the Unity News Network (UNN) editorial team & various contributors. | UNN always clearly distinguishes between news and opinion pieces and as an open minded outlet we publish views from a variety of people and organisation that do not necessarily reflect the views of UNN or its writers. Articles published under UNN Opinions are always opinion pieces and if published on behalf of a contributor will contain that authors name at the start of the piece.
