By The Truth Reporter:
It’s very easy to become despondent in the current climate, with the constant government propaganda telling people what they can and cannot do and the slavish compliance of huge sectors of the population it seems ever more difficult to swim upstream in the current of lies and deceit.
The recent anti lockdown protests, although totally ignored by the mainstream media served as a testament to the solidarity and cohesion of those who will not submit to this agenda. Observers on the ground who were actively involved can confirm that the demographic of the protestors was nothing like the ‘right wing conspiracy theorists organised via Telegram’ that the toxic BBC want people to believe were there. These people came from all possible social and ethnic backgrounds joined by the common belief that the lockdowns were not only ineffective but also hugely damaging to the social fabric of the nation – and they want no part of it.
Despite the warnings and the bleating of the government there have been no localised spikes in infections or deaths as a result of these mass gatherings, maybe this is another reason why the mainstream media refuse to admit they went on. Every logical and systematic analysis of the evidence of our own eyes proves this pandemic narrative is false and yet the government still insist on perpetuating it. Why?
Many narratives exist to explain what is going on. One of the most compelling is the idea of the ‘great reset’ as illustrated by people like Klaus Schwab who make no secret of their wish to reshape the global economy in new ‘equitable and sustainable’ ways. What he actually means is that he wants you to accept vastly lowered standards of living and freedom to fit in with his globalist agenda. I will not explain this further as if you have read this far you know precisely what I am talking about.
My central assertion in this missive is simple – like the Martians in War of the Worlds, the oppressors failed to account for one thing in their meticulous plan. Mother nature.
The idea that everyone is the same and that there are no differences between races is one of those Marxist concepts that has increasingly become accepted as the norm but yet is refuted by every single piece of authoritative research that has ever been conducted. Books like ‘The Bell Curve’ are derided by modern academia but the evidence within is compelling and intuitively obvious to those willing to take the time to understand the concepts.
There is insufficient space to go into a long discourse on genetics here but if you can please go to YouTube and watch the video on the link below. The silver fox experiments prove that if you breed certain traits into a species then other traits will also follow on.
If you accept that genetics is universal to all life then the same will be true of human beings, if we now select for people who will comply with government directives, take vaccines when they are told and sit indoors because they have been given the impression that there is some phantom menace lurking outside then what sort of population will arise?
The answer is a weak population, a population who fear to explore, to challenge norms or to take risks. All these attributes are key to what led to the rise of man from hunter gatherer to subsistence farmer and then from pre-industry to the industrial revolution and the present time.
Mr Schwab seems to think that progress is something you can take for granted, it is not. Progress is carried on the shoulders of an outlier class in society, those who have abnormally high intelligence in one specific area. These people tend to be awkward misfits and usually difficult to relate to. They don’t go to football, ride a peloton bike or shop at Next yet it is this demographic that society relies on for the next technological breakthrough. Problem is that these people won’t fit into Schwab’s new system and they will choose to leave or simply never be born in the first instance.
The seeds of this change have already been sown. Only today we see headlines in the mainstream press that unvaccinated people will be the reason lockdowns do not end for good in June. This is quite simply unsupportable by any scientific analysis but will be used to marginalise anyone who does not submit to the vaccine agenda.
What Mr Schwab has done is effectively turned your pre-covid lifestyle into a commodity that he is trying to sell back to you in small pieces in return for new levels of compliance with his great reset agenda. Some people are so desperate to get back their holidays in Benidorm or attendance at football that they would wear asbestos underpants and paint themselves mauve if that is what he demands. Some others will simply say ‘no thank you’ and modify their behaviour.
This dynamic will only increase, people will find themselves making these decisions on a daily basis on how much of the covid agenda they are prepared to go along with. Eventually a hard core of refuseniks will emerge and will in the long run have to exist outside of the new ‘mainstream’ society that Schwab and his cohorts are busy constructing.
The bad thing for Klaus is that the genetics of those outside his system will be tougher, more resourceful, more willing to take risks or experiment and ultimately become a new race that is resistant to adversity whilst the ‘mainstream’ decline into people who fear to challenge the orthodoxy, discover or innovate which means in the long term they will simply no longer possess the fortitude to maintain the system that uncle Klaus built for them.
This is not a new concept, it has been explored in many Scifi genres, but for the first time I see concrete evidence that we are descending into such a divergence. The results will not be good for those who think they can rely on ‘the system’ – because one day it will not be there.
Opinions from the Unity News Network (UNN) editorial team & various contributors. | UNN always clearly distinguishes between news and opinion pieces and as an open minded outlet we publish views from a variety of people and organisation that do not necessarily reflect the views of UNN or its writers. Articles published under UNN Opinions are always opinion pieces and if published on behalf of a contributor will contain that authors name at the start of the piece.
