The Hydroxychloroquine Scandal – A Crime Against Humanity?


The scandalous game of political football being played with Hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for Covid-19 continues unabated.  This is my 5th article covering the many twists and turns in this crucially important story. 

The debacle that has unfolded has very little to do with science or medicine, but everything to do with politics, money and power.


From the outset of the Coronavirus pandemic and the lockdown regimes that followed, we have been repeatedly told, by all the usual suspects and mainstream media, that the only way to get back to normal is with a vaccine.

The Gates led cartel (which includes the UK Government) have invested heavily during its two-decade mission to create “healthy markets for vaccines”

It is important to note that there is far more than “healthcare” riding off the back of the Coronavirus vaccine programme.  The vaccine sits at the centre of a web of surveillance, a whole new tech industry is springing up, combining global corporations and intelligence agencies, set to monitor, control and surveil populations restricting movement, access to employment and services based upon an allocated bio immunity passport.  What you could call a disease intelligence industrial complex.”

The wall of resistance to trialling Hydroxychloroquine was immediately evident. The Vaccine Community whom I prefer to call the “Extreme Vaccine Cartel” do not want Hydroxychloroquine’s success to reach the masses and a compliant mainstream media have been all to ready to assist in “controlling the narrative”.  

The leading scientific advocates of Hydroxychloroquine recommend that it should primarily be used in the early stages of COVID-19, or even prior to developing the virus, as a prophylactic (preventative) treatment.  When a person develops the symptoms of COVID-19 they could, for example, begin a course of what has become known as the “Marseille Treatment”: Hydroxychloroquine with the antibiotic Azithromycin (HCQ+AZ) plus Zinc which has had success globally. 

I have reported on Hydroxychloroquine’s successes in my previous articles – what I wish to set out here is the astounding story of politics involved in the clinical trials which should be of major concern to all of us.

There are 2 major clinical trials being undertaken:- 

  1. The Solidarity Trial organised and overseen by the World Health Organisation and its board comparing:- 
  • Hydroxychloroquine  – WITHDRAWN
  • Remdesivir
  • Lopinavir/Rotonavir 
  • Interferon beta-1a

Funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, pharma giants Glaxosmithkline, Bayer, Sanofi, Merck and Gildead Sciences (whose drug Remdisivir is currently being trialled alongside Hydroxychloroquine).

The WHO’s Solidarity Trials to test Hydroxychloroquine was launched on 18 March. 

At the same time, the WHO launched its Solidarity Trial for potential vaccines.

  1. The Recovery Trial being conducted by The Nuffield Department of Population Health at the University of Oxford comparing:-
  • Lopinavir-Ritonavir 
  • Low does Dexamethasone (a steroid used to reduce inflammation)
  • Hydroxychloroquine – WITHDRAWN
  • Azithromycin
  • Tocilizumab
  • Convalescent plasma

Funded by The Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) – a UK Government Agency, the largest research funder in Europe with a budget of over £1BN.  

At the same time the Oxford University are running vaccine trials, in partnership with AstraZeneca.  

The Recovery Trial was not investigating the prophylactic (preventative) potential of Hydroxychloroquine.

The UK government did not take part in the WHO’s Solidarity trials, instead running their own Recovery Trials and separate COPCOV and PRINCIPLE trials.

In my 4th article I reported on the fact that a study published in the Lancet Medical Journal stating Hydroxychloroquine was unsafe resulted in the World Health Organisation removing Hydroxychloroquine from its trial, only for the study to be found fraudulent and RETRACTED shortly afterwards. 

Hydroxychloroquine Trials Abandoned for No Reason at all

Following exposure of the fake science, the WHO claimed they would reinstate Hydroxychloroquine to the Solidarity Trials.  

However, a couple of days later Professor Landray of the Oxford University made an announcement to the press that the Recovery Trial would be ceasing its trial of HydroxychloroquineHe Stated:-

The Recovery trial is a “gold standard” randomised controlled trial and an incredibly important result, worldwide we can now stop using a drug that is useless”. 

 If you are admitted to Hospital, don’t take hydroxychloroquine it doesn’t work the hype should now stop.

One of the key lessons we should learn historically is that making treatment decisions based on observational data is not the best way forward” 


As soon as this was reported by the media the World Health Organisation announced they had terminated their Hydroxychloroquine arm of the Solidarity trials. Interestingly, they stated:-

This decision applies only to the conduct of the Solidarity trial and does not apply to the use or evaluation of Hydroxychloroquine in pre or post-exposure prophylaxis in patients exposed to COVID-19”.

Fraudulent Data/Flawed Modelling

The only released data has come from the Recovery Trials, also referenced by the WHO. Yet the Recovery Trial has also been exposed once again as “scientific nonsense”. 

The deputy Chief Investigator of the Recovery Trials, Professor Martin Landray gave an interview to FranceSoir and what he revealed was both remarkable and deeply disturbing.


Firstly, the mortality rate of the Hydroxychloroquine patients was a staggering 25.7%.

The recommended Hydroxychloroquine dose for an adult in the UK is no more than 200-400mg per day.  In France 1800mg per day is considered to be lethal poisoning.

Patient participants in the Recovery Trials were given 2400mg (six times the recommended maximum dose) in the first twenty-four hours. This was followed up by ten days at 800mg, twice the recommended maximum dose.

This looked more like an experiment in toxic poisoning. It would seem to account for the atrocious mortality rate.

Their explanation “The dose was chosen by using computer generated mathematical models”.  Where have we heard this before?

Source: Twitter


I am no doctor I always base my analysis upon research and “gut instinct”.  

  1. We have witnessed fake science, fake data and deliberately destructive studies being applied to ensure Hydroxychloroquine is never trialled as a preventative COVID-19 treatment.  If it were widely acknowledged as effective, the already spurious argument for a COVID-19 vaccine would evaporate.
  2. Both major clinical trials are funded by “the same Extreme Vaccine Cartel” 
  3. Both trials were also running the vaccine trials which better serves the major donors ultimate agenda.

For those who believe that my analysis is based upon nothing more than conspiracy theory, I ask 2 questions:-

  1. Why did the clinical trials not include preventative treatments such as the Marseille Treatment?
  2. Why were patients in the Trial administered with 6 times the recommended dose?

I believe that a CRIME AGAINST HUMMANITY has taken place here but the million dollar question is are the “Extreme Vaccine Cartel” – who appear to be holding the field of medicine hostage – above the law?

Watch this space….







Leave a Reply