We’re all in ‘Cancer Ward’ now

Dr Niall McCrae PhD MSc RMN

This is to all you ‘jabby dodgers’ out there. Not only to anyone who has avoided injection of experimental covid-19 vaccines, but also to those who took a first or second dose and decided against taking any more ([perhaps due to troubling side effects). While the compliant will soon be rolling up their sleeves for the boosters in autumn, the state is most displeased with us, the refuseniks. The choice will be clear: either succumb to vaccination (and co-operate with the digital surveillance system) or be ostracised from society.  

The great Russian author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn saw how medicine was used by the Soviet Union to impose social order. Sent to a gulag for mocking Stalin, Solzhenitsyn was transferred to a hospital for treatment of a tumour, where he had radiation therapy for several hours each day. His experiences were fictionalised in Cancer Ward. Oleg Kostoglotov found that doctors were no different from camp guards, ensuring that patients had no autonomy, their individualism crushed by a system that treated them as detritus. 

Doctor Ludmila Afanasyevna Dontsova, who led the radiotherapy department, reproached Kostoglotov, who asked too many questions. ‘You will go home when I consider it necessary to interrupt your treatment’. Kostoglotov replied: – 

‘Ludmila Afanasyevna, can’t we get away from this tone of voice? You sound like a grown-up talking to a child. Why not talk as an adult to an adult? …You start from a completely false position. No sooner does a patient come to you than you begin to do all his thinking for him. And once again I become like a grain of sand, just like I was in the camp.’ 

The hospital was like prison, with tight discipline, barred windows, cramped wards with bunk beds, and terrified patients forced to undergo radical photic and hormonal treatment. This was life, but not living. 

Already some countries are setting up internment camps for people who refuse covid jabs. British health secretary Matt Hancock implies that the unvaccinated may be deprived access to NHS care. Perhaps something akin to the moralistic 19th-century workhouse system will be instituted, segregating the antisocial and unclean from the good people. 

The incarcerated will get no sympathy from bien pensants. Malcolm Muggeridge described the comfortable classes of Western society as superficial and selfish. Indeed, a stark phenomenon during the covid regime is the affluent middle-class indifference to the plight of the poor and the strivers in lockdown. Livelihoods have been destroyed, while fully-paid administrators enjoy working from home and ordering goodies from Amazon and Deliveroo. 

Of course, such haughty attitudes are not only about a virus. We are immersed in a conflict of morality. Critical thinkers, like in communist regimes, are not appreciated, and must be banished and smeared as an ‘anti-vaxxer’. No debate is allowed on covid-19 because the narrative is ideological and deliberately discriminatory. Either believe and comply, or you will be vilified. This has all happened before. Totalitarianism attracts people who prefer certainty and control to ‘live and let live’ (ironically, the most zealous covid enforcers described themselves as liberal). 

For decades, pseudo-scientific and atheist collectivism has been brainwashed into the younger generations. In Jesus: the Man Who Lives (1973), Malcolm Muggeridge portrayed such ideology as diabolic: the Devil is a compelling demagogue and sloganeer for world domination, while Christian faith promotes truth rather than power. 

The emerging New World Order is often mistaken as communism by the Right, and capitalist greed by the Left. Global corporations from Big Tech to Big Pharma, and the banking ‘masters of the universe’ are hardly Marxist. But the globalists have learned from the unholy alliance of communism and mega-capitalism in China, whose state control has become a model for technocracy. 

However, communism has for many decades been regarded as a progressive movement by the Western intelligentsia. Zbigbiew Brzezinski, who founded the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller saw Marxism as the most rational system of government. But he was not thinking of tractor production figures. Brzezinski, author of The Technetronic Revolution (1971) proposed global unification through technology and electronics, with people governed by experts applying a ‘pure social science’. 

In the means-to-an-end thinking of Stalin and Mao, the death of a million is a mere statistic. But is a cull actually desirable, when awkward people get in the way? Let me end with a quote from a 1970s article in The Keys of Peter periodical: –

‘Like communism, monopoly capitalism is no respecter of conscience, the individual or of nations. Inevitably, there will be a serious and sustained confrontation between the Church – the only legitimate universal authority – and organisations committed to a secular world order. The most immediate area of conflict will be about population control, because organisations like the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome, World Bank and Worldwatch are deeply committed to Malthusian concepts.’

 

If the technocrats prevail the masses will be disenfranchised and totally controlled by an elite, who will determine who lives, procreates or dies. Not many babies were born in the gulag archipelago…