Without Data it is NOT Science

During the course of the Covid-19 Plandemic we have witnessed how a web of powerful influential foundations, international bodies and big pharma working with global governments have led the covid narrative “flooding the zone” with their “trusted sources” (as played out in the Event 201 Pandemic Simulation a couple of months prior to the arrival of the “Pandemic”).

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/event-201-the-pandemic-simulation-exercise-for-the-worlds-elite/

Only 1 narrative was ever allowed to reach the public.  A carefully crafted operation successfully “enabled” by a massive censorship operation of any alternative scientific and medical voices undertaken in perfect lockstep by big tech and corporate media.

Even the once esteemed medical journals “had their part to play in the massive pro-vaccine propaganda campaign – suppressing and “debunking” any alternative covid-19 treatment should any “make their way into the public domain” as we witnessed with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. 

Once gold-plated reputations now lie in tatters, all integrity lost in the name of promoting global corporate interests.  A case of he who pays the piper calls the tune?

We now come to learn that Dr Peter McCullough is suing a medical journal for refusing to publish a study that shows covid shots pose a risk to children, if proven true (which I have  no reason to doubt) – this is an act that has sunk to new depths even by the standards we have witnessed from these “medical journals” thus far. 

But whilst The Lancet/The New England Journal of Medicine/JAMA and Elsevier may have some serious questions to answer – there has been one medical journal who have upheld their integrity throughout this whole debarcle and that is the British Medical Journal (BMJ). I take my hat off to them for their bravery in facing up to the powerful vested interests who do a hit job on anyone brave enough to “take them on”.

In a video dated 2 November, 2021, of a meeting organised by Sen. Ron Johnson, Peter Doshi Ph.D, associate editor of The BMJ, reviewed some of the many concerns experts have about the integrity of the COVID-19 jab data. 

Doshi points out that Pfizer’s raw trial data will NOT be made available until May 2025. So far, Pfizer has refused to release any of its raw data to independent investigators and, without that, there’s no possible way to confirm that what Pfizer is claiming is actually true and correct.

Quoting from a 2020 article he co-wrote he states:

“Data transparency is not a ‘nice to have.’ Claims made without access to the data — whether appearing in peer reviewed publications or in preprints without peer review — are not scientific claims.

“The point I am trying to make is very simple,” Doshi said. “The data from COVID vaccines are not available and won’t be available for years. Yet, we are not just ‘asking’ but ‘mandating’ millions of people to take these vaccines … Without data, it’s not science.”

As noted by Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford’s School of Medicine Clinical Excellence Research Centre, who also spoke at the meeting:

“The evidence we have comes from highly curated, industry-controlled press releases and journal publications. We are making big decisions based on limited, highly selected evidence. A compromised scientific process will lead to poor decisions, and it may set a bad precedent.”

BMJ CONTACTED BY PFIZER WHISTLEBLOWER 

• According to a whistle blower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 Covid jab trial, data were falsified, patients were unblinded, the company hired poorly trained people to administer the injections, and follow-up on reported side effects lagged way behind
• Brook Jackson was the regional director of Ventavia Research Group, a research organisation charged with testing Pfizer’s Covid Jab at several sites in Texas.  Jackson repeatedly “informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient, safety concerns and data integrity issues,” and when her concerns were ignored, she finally filed a complaint with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
• The FDA did not follow up on her complaint.  Ventavia was not one of the 9 trial locations audited, and Pfizer did not bring any of those issues up when applying for emergency use authorisation for its Covid shot
• Documentation shared by Jackson shows a Ventavia executive had identified 3 site staff members who had falsified data  
• After being notified of Jackson’s complaints, Pfizer contracted Ventavia to conduct 4 additional trials – 1 for Covid shots in children and young adults, 1 for the Covid jab in pregnant women, a booster shot trial, and an RSV vaccine trial. 

Mainstream Media Blackout

Mainstream media have completely ignored what should have been front-page news.  What makes the media’s silence all the more remarkable is that this revelation was published in The British Medical Journal. Paul Thacker, investigative journalist for The BMJ, writes in his November 2, 2021, report:

“Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight …

For researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety … Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.”

As noted by Bill Bruckner for transparimed.org:

 “Editors’ widespread failure to pick up on the story is deeply problematic. First and foremost, it lets the U.S. FDA off the hook for what appear to be severe lapses in regulatory oversight over this trial … Where are the media outlets questioning the FDA about its oversight processes? Where are the politicians calling for an enquiry? …

It lets Pfizer off the hook for apparently failing to adequately oversee the operations of its subcontractor … Where are the media outlets questioning Pfizer about its oversight and quality assurance processes? …

It also undermines confidence in democratic institutions and public health bodies because it gives citizens … the impression that mainstream media are deliberately ignoring a big story in order to avoid fuelling “vaccine hesitancy.”

So far, this story has been largely confined to alternative news media.  

Research Organisation Falsified Data in Pfizer Trial

Brook Jackson repeatedly “informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns and data integrity issues,” Thacker writes, and when her concerns were ignored, she finally called the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and filed a complaint via email.

Jackson was fired later that day after just 2 weeks on the job. According to her separation letter, management decided she was “not a good fit” for the company after all. She has provided The BMJ with “dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings and emails” proving her concerns were valid. According to Jackson, this was the first time she’d ever been fired in her 20-year career as a clinical research coordinator. 

“Jackson was a trained clinical trial auditor who previously held a director of operations position and came to Ventavia with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management.

Exasperated that Ventavia was not dealing with the problems, Jackson documented several matters late one night, taking photos on her mobile phone. One photo, provided to The BMJ, showed needles discarded in a plastic biohazard bag instead of a sharps container box.

Another showed vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants … Jackson told The BMJ that drug assignment confirmation printouts were being left in participants’ charts, accessible to blinded personnel …

In a recording of a meeting in late September 2020 between Jackson and two directors a Ventavia executive can be heard explaining that the company wasn’t able to quantify the types and number of errors they were finding when examining the trial paperwork for quality control. ‘In my mind, it’s something new every day,’ a Ventavia executive says. ‘We know that it’s significant.’

Ventavia was not keeping up with data entry queries, shows an email sent by ICON, the contract research organization with which Pfizer partnered on the trial. ICON reminded Ventavia in a September 2020 email: ‘The expectation for this study is that all queries are addressed within 24hrs.’

ICON then highlighted over 100 outstanding queries older than three days in yellow. Examples included two individuals for which ‘Subject has reported with Severe symptoms/reactions … Per protocol, subjects experiencing Grade 3 local reactions should be contacted. Please confirm if an UNPLANNED CONTACT was made and update the corresponding form as appropriate.’

According to the trial protocol a telephone contact should have occurred ‘to ascertain further details and determine whether a site visit is clinically indicated.’ Documents show that problems had been going on for weeks.

In a list of ‘action items’ circulated among Ventavia leaders in early August 2020, shortly after the trial began and before Jackson’s hiring, a Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to ‘Go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.’ One of them was ‘verbally counseled for changing data and not noting late entry,’ a note indicates.”

FDA Ignored Whistleblower Concerns

Not a single one of the problems Jackson raised in her complaint to the FDA were noted or addressed in Pfizer’s briefing document submitted to the FDA’s advisory committee meeting when its emergency use authorization application was reviewed.

The FDA went ahead, granting the Pfizer jab emergency use authorization the very next day, despite being in receipt of Jackson’s complaint, which ought to have put the brakes on the FDA’s authorization. At bare minimum, they should have investigated the matter before proceeding.

The complaint also appears to have been ignored when the FDA granted full approval to Comirnaty, Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID shot that is not yet available.

Shortly after Jackson’s firing, Pfizer was notified of the problems she’d raised. Despite that, Pfizer has since then contracted Ventavia to conduct no less than four additional trials — one for COVID shots in children and young adults, one for the COVID jab in pregnant women, a booster shot trial, and an RSV vaccine trial.

So, clearly, Pfizer is not opposed to contractors falsifying data or otherwise undermining the integrity of the trials. That alone is a fiery indictment against Pfizer.

They can feign ignorance and proclaim to adhere to “the highest scientific, ethical and clinical standards” all they want. Those are just words which, unless backed by consistent action, are completely meaningless. Behind the scenes, they’re clearly well-aware that their trials are resting on fraudulent foundations.

Pfizer Trial Described as a ‘Crazy Mess’

Jackson wasn’t the only employee to get sacked from Ventavia after raising concerns about the integrity of the Pfizer trial. Thacker writes:

“In recent months Jackson has reconnected with several former Ventavia employees who all left or were fired from the company. One of them was one of the officials who had taken part in the late September meeting. In a text message sent in June the former official apologized, saying that ‘everything that you complained about was spot on.’

Two former Ventavia employees spoke to The BMJ anonymously for fear of reprisal and loss of job prospects in the tightly knit research community. Both confirmed broad aspects of Jackson’s complaint.

One said that she had worked on over four dozen clinical trials in her career, including many large trials, but had never experienced such a ‘helter skelter’ work environment as with Ventavia on Pfizer’s trial. ‘I’ve never had to do what they were asking me to do, ever,’ she told The BMJ. ‘It just seemed like something a little different from normal — the things that were allowed and expected’ …

After Jackson left the company problems persisted at Ventavia, this employee said. In several cases Ventavia lacked enough employees to swab all trial participants who reported COVID-like symptoms, to test for infection. Laboratory confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 was the trial’s primary endpoint, the employee noted.

(An FDA review memorandum released in August this year states that across the full trial swabs were not taken from 477 people with suspected cases of symptomatic COVID-19.) ‘I don’t think it was good clean data,’ the employee said of the data Ventavia generated for the Pfizer trial. ‘It’s a crazy mess.’”

Such statements clearly fly in the face of statements made by world leaders, health authorities and the mainstream media. Most, like federal health minister for Australia, Greg Hunt, have claimed the COVID shots have undergone “rigorous, independent testing” to ensure they’re “safe, effective and manufactured to a high standard.”

The testing appears to have been far from rigorous and has not been independently verified.

Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data show they’re shockingly far from safe; real-world data show effectiveness wanes within a handful of months while leaving you more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 variants and other infections; and manufacturing standards have also been shown lacking, as a variety of foreign contaminants have been found in the vials.

Media Are Manipulated by Pfizer

One of the reasons why English- and German-speaking legacy media have completely ignored this whistleblower testimony is probably because Pfizer has such a dominating influence over them. Thacker told blogger Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., “Pfizer has such a huge PR machine, they have basically captured the media, they’ve hypnotized the media.”

Pfizer’s PR department is also hard at work trying to hypnotise the public. This TV ad is perhaps one of the most offensive.  In it, Pfizer brainwashes young children into thinking that getting the COVID shot will make them superheroes. Never mind the fact that getting the shot could kill or permanently injure them.

https://twitter.com/mercola/status/1456230659282903041?s=21

Analysis

For those of us awake and watching closely, I believe the facts are clear – We’re getting a close-up view of just how dangerous the incestuous relationship between the regulatory bodies and Big Pharma actually is.  Regulatory Capture….

I will leave you with a very pertinent BMJ article which sums up perfectly where I believe we are today within the “global healthcare system”.

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjHoca9wgoY https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

https://declarationofopinion.wordpress.com/2021/11/04/peter-doshi-associate-editor-bmj-u-s-senator-ron-johnson-holds-panel-in-dc-on-covid-19-vaccine-mandates-and-injuries/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/are-medical-journals-withholding-publication-of-ivermectin-studies/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/dr-mccullough-sues-medical-journal-for-refusing-to-publish-papers-showing-covid-shot-risks-in-children/

https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/designed-to-fail-why-regulatory-agencies-dont-work/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/fda-panel-oks-covid-shot-for-5-11-year-olds-we-are-never-going-to-learn-how-safe-a-vaccine-is-until-we-start-giving-it/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/covid-19-vaccination-for-children-expert-urges-unbreakable-resistance/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/new-report-concludes-health-risks-caused-by-covid-19-vaccines-are-simply-too-high-for-children/