Lawyer gives opinion on Kate Shemirani comments as social media storm continues

At Saturday’s pro-freedom rally in London Kate Shemirani made a series of comments in relation to Doctors and Nurses that has provoked a vigorous debate on social media including calls from NHS employees and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan for the Metropolitan Police to investigate.
The Metropolitan Police have said that an investigation has now been launched while in a segment on BBC Radio 4 her son Sebastian Shemirani suggested that his Mother should be prosecuted under existing ‘Hate Speech Laws’ and if these laws were not broken new laws should be made in order to prosecute her:
Now UK employment Anna De Buisseret has issued a statement that we can bring to our readers on this matter where she clearly states that Kate Shemirani was stating a historical truth:
“As a senior UK lawyer myself, I have listened to and read the comments about what Ms Shemarani is saying.
She’s referring to the Doctors and Nurses Trials held in Nuremberg during the 1940s onwards in which numerous doctors and nurses were found liable and guilty for countless deaths from injections and other medical procedures.
The sentence handed down by the Judges was imprisonment or the death penalty (by hanging) for those found guilty.
So she is stating the facts of the Nuremberg Trials.
The current law is set out in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
The sentences for breaches of the Rome Statute are contained in the Statute.
Breaches of the Nuremberg Code will fall within various laws both civil and criminal.
““On December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity.
This was Case #1 of the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings.
Brigadier General Telford Taylor was Chief of Counsel during the Doctors Trial. In Taylor’s own words, from the opening statement by the prosecution:
“The defendants in this case are charged with murders, tortures, and other atrocities committed in the name of medical science.
The victims of these crimes are numbered in the hundreds of thousands.
A handful only are still alive; a few of the survivors will appear in this courtroom.
But most of these miserable victims were slaughtered outright or died in the course of the tortures to which they were subjected.
For the most part they are nameless dead.
To their murderers, these wretched people were not individuals at all.
They came in wholesale lots and were treated worse than animals.”
The Judgments from these Trials should be read by anyone conducting medical procedures to ensure that they are not in breach of the law.
If the idea that the death sentence would be handed down to a perpetrator is something that people are concerned about, I invite you to read the case law yourself on the law.
In particular, Montgomery v Lanarkshire NHS Trust 2015 and Bell v Tavistock 2020.
And the Nuremberg judgments.”
As of yet there has been no update from the Metropolitan Police on this issue.

-->