Why Is The CDC Quietly Abandoning The PCR Test For COVID?

I have written a number of articles (attached) outlining the controversy surrounding the misleading results of the PCR test due to its amplification threshold of 45+ cycle giving high false positive.  The PCR test has been consistently held out by Public Health Authorities and Governments globally – as the gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2/Covid-19.  

PCR instruments are not quantitative instruments. They cannot tell you how much of something is present in a given sample. Every lab scientist familiar with PCR instruments knows this. 

Even Dr Anthony Fauci admitted that the PCR Test’s high Ct is misleading:-

“What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard,” Fauci said, is that “if you get a 

cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule.”

“It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians,” he continued, when “somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle.” 

So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.”

So why Is The CDC now Quietly Abandoning The PCR Test For COVID?

It has come to my attention that as from 31st December 2021, the CDC (America’s National Public Health Agency) will withdraw the request to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorisation of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR.

At first glance it would appear the PCR test is being “binned” – but closer inspection shows that this is not the case at all.  Instead they will be bringing to market what they call a “multiplexed method” that can differentiate between SARS-Cov-2 and influenza viruses.

Is this not an admission that the “flu cases” (which miraculously all but disappeared last year) have been recorded as Covid-cases by a PCR test which couldn’t differentiate between the two viruses?. 

Twindemic

I wrote an article in October 2020 entitled “What is the New Twindemic – is it about to Hit”?” https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/what-is-the-new-twindemic-is-it-about-to-hit/

Extract…. 

[Twindemic is the new shorthand for the convergence of flu season in the Autumn and the current COVID-19 pandemic

“We’re going to be totally confused,” University of Michigan School of Public Health epidemiologist Arnold Monto told The Washington Post.

”Making matters worse, it can be difficult for even doctors to reliably tell the difference between the flu and coronavirus due to their many overlapping symptoms].” 

As more of the population become vaccinated the system of PCR testing/recording of “Covid” deaths within 28 days of a PCR test started to present a problem for the “vaccine programme”…. 

Casedemic – CDC Intentionally Undercounting Covid-19 “Breakthrough Cases” in Vaccinated Persons

Extract….

[“Reports are now starting to emerge of fully vaccinated people testing positive for covid-19.  These “breakthrough coronavirus infections” (vaccine failures) if significant in number would call into question the efficacy of the “vaccines” (gene therapies).

A Senior Sage source has stated “it will potentially distort estimates of vaccine efficacy – the current definition will have to be revised at some point”.]

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test.  A system which differentiates between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.  

Who Benefits?

The question one has to ask is – as with everything else that happens in the Healthcare-Industrial-Complex – who benefits?

Is another provider of testing about to be enrichened?

George Soros & Bill Gates lead buyout of UK Covid Testing Company…

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/freedom-in-name-only-frino/

Analysis

It would appear that using a flawed test that ramps up “cases”- (i) via false positives; and (ii) false diagnosis – was deemed acceptable when used to terrify people into taking an experimental injection, yet is being taken off the market and replaced when it calls into question the efficacy of the “vaccines”.

Is this fraud by any other name?

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/from-payroll-to-carbon-are-you-sustainable/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/your-coronavirus-test-is-positive-but-what-does-that-mean/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/is-the-pcr-test-fit-for-purpose-10-fatal-errors/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/right-on-cue-for-biden-who-admits-high-cycle-pcr-tests-produce-covid-false-positives/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-25-cdc-withdraws-fraudulent-pcr-testing-protocol-used-to-falsify-covid-positives.html

https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-26th-july-2021

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/a-deep-dive-into-the-ideological-system-of-governance-that-is-technocracy/

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/when-is-a-vaccine-not-a-vaccine-answer-when-it-is-an-experimental-gene-therapy/

 

-->