Supreme Court Judges exposed for outrageous remain bias

UNN is fighting back against the MSM bias, the people of the UK see the Judiciary is corrupt and common purpose influenced. This article would normally be part of our subscriber only Premium Content section but due to the significance of it is open for everyone to read.

Now we name them all these judges below and highlight the remain bias known so far:

 

Lady Hale, 74 As the Supreme Court’s first female president since its creation 10 years ago, Lady Hale – a grammar school girl from Yorkshire – has been critical of the lack of female representation on the body with only three out of 12 Supreme Court justices are women.

She has previously spoken about the importance and significance of diversity, arguing that “in a democracy which values everyone equally, and not just the privileged and the powerful, it is important that their rights and responsibilities should be decided by a judiciary which is more reflective of the society as a whole, and not just a very small section of it”.

Lady Hale – who was born Brenda Hale – is not one to shy away from challenging legal traditions and has previously objected to barristers and judges being forced to wear wigs in court. She has branded the attire as “silly” and “18th Century dress in the 21st Century”.

“My main objection is that they are men’s wigs. Of course, that is one of the reasons why the early women barristers wanted to wear wigs. It was because they wanted to look like everybody else. But we have got beyond that.”

She is said, according to social media, to embrace the ideas of Open Borders and equality which are favoured by Remainers.

Lady Hale led a Supreme Court appeal by the parents of baby Charlie Gard over plans to take him to the US for treatment.  Chris Gard and Connie Yates wanted their 10-month old, who suffered from a rare genetic condition, to undergo a therapy trial. His mother broke down and screamed as the decision was announced.

Justice Lady Hale began by praising their devotion, as parents we would all want to do the same she said. But as judges and not as parents they were concerned with the legal position and the proposed appeal she said was refused.

Charlie’s mother Connie left the court wailing and shouting “they’ve put us through hell”. Chris, Charlie’s father, held his head in hands and cried.

Lord Kerr, 71 Brian Kerr is the first justice of the court to come from Northern Ireland, where he served as Lord Chief Justice from 2004 to 2009. Educated at St Colman’s College, Newry, and Queen’s University, Belfast, he was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 1970, and to the Bar of England and Wales in 1974. He even spoke on a Channel 4 programme where he declared that submitting Article 50 wasn’t final for the UK leaving the EU meaning it could be overturned!

Lord Wilson, 74 Nicholas Wilson was appointed in 2009, having previously been a judge in the High Court’s family division and the Court of Appeal.

Lord Carnwath, 74 Robert Carnwath studied at Cambridge and was called to the Bar in 1968. He served as attorney general to the Prince of Wales from 1988 to 1994. While a judge of the Chancery Division, he was also chairman of the Law Commission and, between 2007 and 2012, was Senior President of Tribunals.

Lord Hodge, 66 Patrick Hodge, the court’s other Scottish justice, was previously the Scottish judge in Exchequer Causes, one of the Scottish intellectual property judges, a judge in the Lands Valuation Appeal Court and a commercial judge. This role would have seen him linked with the EU Common Agricultural Policy payments.

Watch below & SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube Channel:

Lady Black, 65 Jill Black, a justice since 2017, carried out a broad range of civil and criminal work during her early career as a barrister before specialising in family law. She has served as a High Court judge and Lady Justice of Appeal. Lady Black taught law at Leeds Polytechnic in the 1980s, was a founding author of the definitive guide to family law practice in England and Wales, and continues to serve as a consulting editor.

Lord Reed, 63 Robert Reed was appointed deputy president of the Supreme Court in June last year and will replace Lady Hale when she retires in January. One of the court’s two Scottish justices, he previously served as a judge in Scotland and sometimes sits as a judge at the European Court of Human Rights and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. He was educated at the universities of Edinburgh and Oxford before qualifying as an advocate in Scotland and a barrister in England and Wales.

Lord Lloyd-Jones, 67 David Lloyd-Jones was born and brought up in Pontypridd, South Wales, where his father was a school teacher, and is the court’s first justice to come from Wales. A Welsh speaker, he was appointed to the High Court in 2005, and acted as adviser to the court in the Pinochet litigation before the House of Lords, this was of course a ruling against General Pinochet that many regarded as political.

Lady Arden, 72 Mary Arden, who grew up in Liverpool, began her judicial career in 1993 after working as a barrister, QC, and attorney general of the Duchy of Lancaster. She became a member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2011, and sits as a judge of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

Lord Kitchin, 64 David Kitchin was called to the Bar in 1977 and his practice covered intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyright, designs and trade secrets. He has also served as a High Court judge and as a Lord Justice of Appeal.

Lord Sales, 57 Philip Sales is the youngest of the court’s justices and was appointed in January, having worked as a barrister and QC before his appointment to the High Court in 2008. He was vice-president of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, served as deputy chairman of the Boundary Commission for England and was appointed as a Lord Justice of Appeal. He was formerly a member of the same set of chambers as Lord Irvine and Tony Blair and is apparently extremely close friends with Tony Blair. A constitutional expert when he practised as a barrister, he was one of the three judges who sat on the high court in the article 50 Miller (No 1) case; he was one of the three judges accused by the Daily Mail after the ruling of being “enemies of the people”

Nearly all of these Judges wholeheartedly embraced the Blairite agenda over the Judiciary in the last 20 years. They are not a representative body of the people of the United Kingdom, they are a part of the elite establishment and this has been a political decision. The majority of 11-0 is simply unheard of in Judicial situations like this. This decision leaves us with massive constitutional questions for the future.

Pro-Brexit campaign organisation UK Unity launched an ‘EMERGENCY PETITION TO OVERTURN THE BIASED JUDGES DECISION!’ you can CLICK HERE to sign this petition now.