The 13th July 2021 marks a very dark day in British history – this was the day the Parliamentarian jackboot crushed – freedom of choice and bodily autonomy – in one fell swoop.
In a profound departure from public health norms, new law will remove the right of care home staff in England to choose whether to be vaccinated against Covid-19.
The intended next step is a rapid and massive expansion of compulsory vaccination legally to require covid-19 and flu vaccination of all frontline health and social care workers, subject to consultation.
A shocking fact to learn is that MPs voted on this without an impact assessment being available – acting without being fully informed – a common theme, surrounding the entire covid vaccination” debarcle I would suggest.
Unnecessary, Disproportionate, and Misguided
Prof Allyson Pollock, Clinical Professor of Public Health, University of Newcastle, stated:-
“The snap vote, taken yesterday in the House of Commons (and in the absence of a needs assessment and proper debate) which enables imposition of mandatory vaccination of care workers is unethical, needless and disproportionate and undermines human rights. It is the start of a slippery slope to impose other requirements and to extend compulsory vaccination to other groups. It overturns 120 years of vaccination legislation and policy which has been built on trust, medical confidentiality and informed consent.
Official claims that “we are not forcing anyone to take the vaccine” are disingenuous. Care home workers who reject covid-19 vaccination will be dismissed from employment without compensation and be barred from access to their occupation. A regulatory amendment will make it unlawful for care homes to permit care workers to enter the care home premises without proof of full vaccination.
Civil liberty is a necessary component of strong public health. Mandatory vaccination is unnecessary and disproportionate.”
The “liberty of non-vaccination” is a principle established in UK law since 1898. It followed vigorous and widespread protest about compulsory vaccination for smallpox that was imposed by the Vaccination Act 1853. Amendments to the Vaccination Act in 1898 and 1907 provided legal recognition of conscientious objection for those who were “honestly opposed” to vaccination and noted, too, the contribution of improved sanitation to the drop in smallpox.
Compulsory vaccination has not been attempted since in the UK, [until now]. https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/374/bmj.n1684.full.pdf
Would it be legal to mandate vaccination?
Isra Black, a law lecturer at the University of York specialising in healthcare law, told The BMJ, “Any public authority, whether the state or individual NHS trusts, that mandates vaccination will need to comply with human rights and equality law.
Mandatory vaccination interferes with the right to Private Life protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, so the relevant authorities will need to show that the interference is justified in its pursuit of a legitimate aim and its proportionality.
“Public bodies must also show that they have taken into account the public sector equality duty and that mandatory vaccination policies comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.”
I would add that further consideration MUST be given to the following as set out by Lawyers for Liberty/the UK Medical Freedom Alliance:-
- It is an established principle in English Law that an individual with the capacity to consent cannot and should not be compelled to have any medical treatment against their wishes. This is further explained below in the section dealing with Informed Consent.
- The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (Section 45E) provides that Regulations made under certain sections of that Act “may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment …. “Medical treatment” includes vaccinations and other prophylactic treatment”.
- Furthermore, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe passed Resolution number 2361 of 2021 on 27 January 2021 in which it was stated that:-
- Paragraph 7.3.1 – ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
- Paragraph 7.3.2 – ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated.
The Covid-19 “vaccines” remain unlicensed products with no medium/long term safety data therefore I believe it is safe to conclude that they fall within the “experimental category”- Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/fact-checkers-go-to-war-on-nuremberg-ii/
Analysis
Forcing scores of workers to be injected against their will [setting a precedent for the rest of society including children] raises huge legal, ethical and moral questions. Government ministers have previously called similar ideas discriminatory – which it is – so what has changed?
Under normal circumstance clinical trial participants are fully aware and compensated for taking part– but in this case most (if not all) of the public are totally unaware that Phase III of the clinical trials do not conclude until 2023.
At this point it is worth remembering the words of Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer of England, when speaking about the “virus”.
And let’s not forget this point when confronted with “it is for the public good”.
It is clear that if we allow the State to remove our freedom of choice/the right to bodily integrity, we no longer live within a free society. My body, my choice right?
Does this breach of the Nuremberg Code – the Fact Checkers say No… https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/fact-checkers-go-to-war-on-nuremberg-ii/
But more importantly, what do you say?
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons/Division/1078#ayes
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1684
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1056.short
https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/no-jab-no-job-judge-paves-way-for-corporate-medical-fascism/
I wrote my first article for Unity News Network on 30th December 2019, and I have been writing ever since – my library is now well in excess of 200 articles.
Alternative media is essential in these times of unprecedented censorship and mainstream bias, which has ramped up exponentially during the past 2 years. The overton window of “acceptable opinion” is growing every narrower.
Having a citizen’s log, cataloguing the twists and turns of life during these turbulent times is essential.
Thank you Unity News Network for allowing me a voice on your platform.
