The WHO Pandemic Treaty – An MP’s Response

This is a follow up to my previous article – which covered a letter that I had sent to my MP outlining my genuine legitimate concerns surrounding the proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty Read here

Extract…  [“The WHO General Assembly is a democratically illegitimate committee that can not only decide what constitutes a pandemic but can then seize executive power upon their own call this is akin to giving the keys of the hen house to the fox.   A case of “those who decide are not elected and those who are elected have nothing to decide”.  

I am therefore extremely concerned that the signing of this document will allow the WHO to prescribe binding measures such as lockdowns, mandatory vaccination and the centralised collection of sensitive personal medical data. 

This Treaty is clearly a direct threat to our nation’s sovereignty and right to bodily autonomy.  It has the very real potential to expand the WHO’s power to dictate all health care policy worldwide.”]

I have now received a response (dated the same day as my letter) suggesting, that this was perhaps a pre-prepared “template” letter.

My concerns remain unaddressed.  

It appears, to my mind, that the Conservative party have not learned lessons from their cataclysmic constitutional error of the past.  [Read here]

“Edward Heath had been warned about the constitutional implications of joining the European Economic Community (EEC) in a letter written by the Lord Chancellor – but he decided to keep quiet and promise the British people the country’s entry would not involve any loss of essential sovereignty, unearthed reports reveal.”

The former Prime Minister had been many times accused of misleading the electorate about the repercussions of Britain’s membership.

Lord Kilmuir stated ‘I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones and I think that as a matter of practical politics it will not be easy to persuade Parliament, or the British public, to accept them.”  

Analysis

How many members of the public know about this current International Treaty (which it  appears from Mr Holloway’s response – in the eyes of the UK Government is a “done deal”)?

I would suspect not very many and therein lies the problem with the “International Community” – these institutions are so far removed from the people that many “deals” are done and “Treaties” signed without the people’s knowledge or consent.

Have the UK Government carried out their due diligence of those to whom they are about to hand such increased power/sensitive personal data?

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is the Director-General of the WHO – note his political party Tigray People’s Liberation Front.  

Extract….[“There are reasonable grounds to believe that gross violations and abuses of international human rights law, and serious violations of international humanitarian law, and international refugee law have been committed in the context of the Tigray conflict,” reads  the report written jointly by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission.

The Ethiopian government and the rebel Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) have denied accusations of atrocities in the past.

Civilians in Tigray have been subjected to brutal violence and suffering. “The gravity and seriousness of the violations and abuses we have documented underscore the need to hold perpetrators accountable on all sides.”

Despite assurances from Ethiopia that investigations and prosecutions of those responsible for atrocities would be undertaken, there remains “a troubling lack of transparency.”]

I have written about Tedros previously here, here and here 

The WHO (a UN agency) has heaped praise upon China for their “openness on coronavirus” 

My MP and the UK Government appear more than happy to trust the WHO – but are you?

Is history about to repeat itself? – only time will tell.

 

Article & UN Report…… https://www.npr.org/2021/11/03/1051846351/u-n-ethiopia-tigray-possible-war-crimes