UN human rights ruling could boost climate change asylum claims

Witnessing the rising tensions, chaos and division descending upon Europe and beyond I decided to delve into where the policies are emanating from – who is really running the show?
I started with the United Nations (UN) and this is when I stumbled across this little gem which I don’t believe has been covered by any British media or Forum – YET!
The UN Human Rights Committee has determined that countries cannot deport people who have sought asylum due to climate-related threats.
The historic ruling marks the first decision by a UN human rights treaty body based on a complaint filed by an individual seeking protection from the effects of climate change.
In 2015 Ioane Teitota from the Pacific island nation of Kiribati lodged a complaint after being deported from New Zealand when his asylum application was denied.

Mr. Teitota argued that his right to life had been violated, as rising sea levels and other destructive effects of climate change had made his homeland uninhabitable.

He said he was forced to migrate from the island of Tarawa, to New Zealand, due to impacts such as a lack of freshwater due to saltwater intrusion, erosion of arable land, and associated violent land disputes which had resulted in numerous fatalities.

New standards’ established

While the UN Committee determined that Mr. Teitota’s right to life had not been violated as sufficient protection measures had been implemented in Kiribati, member Yuval Shany said: “Nevertheless, this ruling sets forth new standards that could facilitate the success of future climate change-related asylum claims.”

The Committee further clarified that people seeking asylum are not required to prove that they would face immediate harm, if deported back to their home countries.

Additionally, Committee members underlined that the International Community MUST assist countries adversely affected by climate change.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/01/1055671

The historic ruling marks the first decision by a UN human rights treaty body based on a complaint filed by an individual seeking protection from the effects of climate change.

What is the United Nations?

The United Nations (UN) was founded in 1945 currently made up of 193 member states.  The UN Charter of 1945 is the Treaty of the UN acting as an intergovernmental organisation.
The mission and work of the UN are guided by the purposes and principles contained within its founding Charter, which articulates a commitment to uphold human rights of citizens and outlined a broad set of principles relating to achieving ‘higher standards of living’, addressing ‘economic, social, health, and related problems,’ and ‘universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all.
As a Charter it is a Constituent Treaty, and all members are bound by its articles.

The UN Security Council – 1946


The UN Security Council formed on 17 January 1946 at Church House, Westminster, London.   Since that date, the Security Council has taken permanent residence at the UN Headquarters in New York City.
A representative of each of its members must be present at all times at UN Headquarters, so that the Security Council can meet at any time as the need arises.
All members of the UN agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council – only the Security Council has the power to make decisions that member states are then obligated to implement under the UN Charter.
Furthermore, Article 103 of the Charter states that obligations to the United Nations prevail over all other treaty obligations

The UN Human Rights Council – 2006

The Human Rights Council is an inter-governmental body within the UN system responsible for strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe and for addressing situations of human rights violations and make recommendations on them. It has the ability to discuss all human rights issues and situations that require its attention throughout the year. It meets at the UN Office at Geneva.

The Council is made up of 47 United Nations Member States which are elected by the UN General Assembly. The Human Rights Council replaced the former UN Commission on Human Rights.

Funding

In 2017, the UN’s revenue totaled US$53.2 billion this is made up of contributions from all 193 members.
The 10 biggest contributors are US/Germany/UK/Japan/China/Sweden/Norway/Canada/Italy/France.  The US pay in over $10bn and the UK around $3.5bn pa.
Analysis 

In Britain we have been solely focusing on the EU but it is The UN who are at the top of the food chain when it comes to policy making – wielding it mighty authority over the “International Community” with its Agenda 30 Programme.

Article 103 of the Charter states that obligations to the United Nations prevail over all other Treaty obligations.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld

Preamble. This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development.

https://unitedkingdom.iom.int/sites/default/files/publication/Migration-and-the%20-2030-Agenda.pdf

Migration and the 2030 Agenda 5 This publication was commissioned by the International Organization for Mi – gration (IOM) with support received from the Swiss Agency for Development

Together the UN and EU are forcefully pushing their “Green Agenda” sending into battle the likes of Greta Thunberg and ex-Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney who has just been appointed as the United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance (he knows where his bread is buttered)!

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/13/firms-ignoring-climate-crisis-bankrupt-mark-carney-bank-england-governor

Policies that were meant to bring peace and prosperity to the people and planet are having the complete opposite effect.  We are witnessing chaos and a distribution of wealth from the bottom to the top – and the people are fighting back.
Will we see a new “climhate crime” emerge or “climaphobia” splashed across our media as the people denounce it – only time will tell.
One thing I can say for certain is that leaving the EU will NOT allow us to take back control – but it sure is a good start!

-->