2020 – The Covid-19 Story


I couldn’t let the year pass without pulling together some of the most interesting and relevant pieces from my articles of 2020 together with a few key dates/events and a sprinkling of my own opinion/analysis thrown in for good measure.   

If we thought the political deception and pantomime surrounding the Brexit years was bad, nothing could have prepared us for the lightening bolt about to strike with the arrival of the “Covid-19 Pandemic”.


And so it begins…..

On 31 January, the first 2 cases of COVID-19 in the UK were confirmed.

At the end of February the Government’s strategy was ‘herd immunity, protect the economy”.

11 March – the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a Pandemic.  Interestingly, and somewhat bizarrely, the WHO’s Pandemic Declaration refers to the spread of a virus, NOT the severity of illness.

19 March The Government together with The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) posted a guidance note on the Government Website which read:- 

“As of 19 March 2020 COVID-19 should no longer be classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease in the UK.”  Several features have now changed; in particular information about mortality rates (low overall). https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

23 March – Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced during a televised address that people should “stay at home”.

People were told to work from home wherever possible, and that they should only leave their homes for essential purposes, such as shopping for food and medicine. One form of exercise per day, and to care for a vulnerable person or for medical purposes.

Boris Johnson’s Coronavirus Herd Immunity Plan was ripped apart by mainstream media, the chattering class and what I now term as the “Medical Industrial Complex” who I believe “control the narrative and shape policy” from the sidelines.  

The “Herd Immunity Let the Old People Die Campaign” was unleashed – designed to sign its death knell and it succeeded spectacularly.

Professor Neil Ferguson from Imperial College was instrumental in this success – together with his historically flawed modelling system – he announced the death of 500,000 people in the UK if the Government did not change course.

In 2001 Ferguson was instrumental in the modelling of Tony Blair’s catastrophic response to Foot and Mouth Disease.  An estimated 12m animals were slaughtered, the farming community was devastated by suicides and bankruptcies.  Ferguson was [reportedly] sacked by DEFRA late in the epidemic, but his “modelling” had already imposed a “new normal” upon Britain’s farming community.   

One has to question with his catastrophic track record why the British Government were so quick to follow his  plan? https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/who-is-professor-neil-ferguson/

It was then I stumbled upon Event 201.

In October 2019 John Hopkins, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum ran a “pandemic simulation” called “Event 201” an event which war gamed a Coronavirus epidemic. 

Attendees: Representatives from the UN, World Bank, China’s CDC, US CDC, the CIA as well as leaders from travel, banking, pharmaceutical, and healthcare services industries.

It was stressed the “Pandemic” should not be seen as a health event but as a “Global Crisis. They spoke at length about finding “Trusted Voices” to put out the “Message/Narrative” – sports personalities/celebrities/community faith-based religious leaders to foster trust with the public at a local level.  It was acknowledged that people did not trust politicians and that politicians required pressure put upon them from various areas (Neil Ferguson?)

They also discussed “Flooding the Zone” with “the message” and eradicating any “disinformation” from other sources. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/event-201-the-pandemic-simulation-exercise-for-the-worlds-elite/


Censorship went off the richter scale.  The Government released its Online Harms white paper calling on Ofcom to regulate social media. 

An army of fact checkers and online influencers appeared. Big tech launched new algorithms and applied updated terms and conditions of service.  Mark Zuckerberg claimed Facebook takes down more than a million “fake accounts” a day.  

What Zuckerberg revealed in his speech at the Munich Security Conference was very telling about the future of social media sending a chilling message to us all.  He stated the pressure being put upon social media platforms comes from an international level and they mean business. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/social-media-censorship-has-mark-zuckerberg-let-the-cat-out-of-the-bag/

This resulted in the last free thinking platform being heavily censored in its content. We have witnessed time and again eminent doctors, scientists and experts removed from social media platforms because they strayed from the “official coronavirus narrative”.  

The Event 201 simulation was played out to the letter.

In May under Court Order the Sage Minutes were released – revealing behavioural techniques had been used upon the public to manipulate behaviour to ensure compliance with draconian Government restrictions.

The next 2 parts of the story are truly shocking, I believe Crimes Against Humanity have been committed, for which I hope justice will be served. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/the-great-barrington-declaration-signed-but-what-comes-next/

Part 1 – The Care Home Scandal

Authorities in several countries, including the United States, Italy, Spain, France and Canada, have launched inquiries into how elderly care facilities responded to the Coronavirus crisis after reports emerged of high death rates at those facilities.

The “Pandemic” shone a spotlight on nursing homes across the world, where thousands of elderly residents most vulnerable to disease, are believed to have died after contracting Coronavirus.  The shocking treatment received by the elderly at the hands of state systems put in place to protect them is an international scandal. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/coronavirus-how-big-is-the-problem-in-care-homes/

Crimes Against Humanity Part 2- The Hydroxychloroquine Story

It is hard to believe the political games that were played with Hydroxychloroquine.  From the moment President Trump announced it a game-changer, through to the manipulation of clinical trials and the Lancet Medical Journal publishing a study based upon fake data which had to be quickly retracted.

This certainly opened my eyes to the many flaws within the political world and the healthcare system which appear to have been hi-jacked by a hugely powerful medical-industrial complex. 

If a cheap effective prophylactic treatment had made it to market this would negate the need for the more expensive prophylactic treatments now being used and remove the necessity for the lucrative experimental vaccine programme. 

The twists and turns in this story were so far reaching and numerous it took 6 articles to cover it all (attached) https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/have-big-tech/

Lockdown Policy 

The Deaths of Despair from Lockdowns will far Outpace Deaths from Coronavirus.

Locking down a population plays no part in the trajectory of a virus, but will, I believe, be found to have had devastating far reaching consequences both on an economic and societal level.  

https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/will-deaths-of-despair-outpace-deaths-04-20/ https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/opinion-testing-cases-lockdowns/https://www.politicalite.com/covid-19/tina-brooker-the-virus-does-not-care-about-politics/ 


Accurate Recording of Death Statistics?

On 29 March Covid-19 became a notifiable disease therefore the system of counting deaths changed.  

Covid deaths include all cases where Covid-19 was mentioned on the death certificate — irrespective of positive testing and whether or not it may have been incidental to, or directly responsible for death.  Care home providers, most of whom are not medically trained, may make a statement to the effect that a patient has died of Covid-19.  In the words of the ONS, this “may or may not correspond to a medical diagnosis or test result”.

Usually, 2 doctors are needed to certify a death, 1 of whom has been treating the patient or who knows them and has seen them recently now the certification can be made by a single doctor, and there is no requirement for them to have examined, or even met, the patient.

So at a time when accurate death statistics are more important than ever, the rules were changed in ways that make them less reliable than ever.  

My investigations uncovered that this was not solely confined to the UK. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/opinion-covid-19-statistics-are-inaccurate/

Efficacy/Safety of Face Masks

I am not medically trained or an expert, but my conclusion from extensive research is that mask wearing is counterproductive to health due to the risks of Hypoxia, Hypercapnia, Toxic Fibres and also Bacterial Pneumonia. 

Dr Russell Blaylock (retired US Neurosurgeon) maintains “by wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.” 

It is unfortunate that the long awaited historic Danish Mask Study was buried by Mainstream Media because it came to the “wrong conclusion” namely, mask wearing is ineffective.

Three medical journals refused to publish the study, the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s Journal JAMA.   Shame on them.




How Accurate are PCR Tests?

As many as 9 out of every 10 PCR tests may not be infectious at all with much of the testing equipment picking up dead fragments of the disease or that from old coronaviruses (of which 4 are the common cold).  With the cycle threshold (amplification cycles) set at up to 40 cycles numerous public health officials believe this is guaranteed to return false positives results.

Professor Carl Heneghan of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University, said tests should have a cut-off point so that very small amounts of virus do not trigger a positive result.

Mass population testing is a flawed idea in search of science to back it up.  

Kary Mullis the inventor of the test stated it should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.”

A Portuguese Court ruled that PCR Tests are “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful”. 


The Corman-Drosten Paper

An “External peer review of the RT-PCR test reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results”.

Dr Kevin Corbett, one of the signatories states…

 “When Drosten developed the test, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code.

The question surrounding the efficacy of the PCR test is one of vital importance given that it is now the driver of this “Pandemic” or should we call it “Casedemic”? https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/your-coronavirus-test-is-positive-but-what-does-that-mean/


Asymptomatic Transmission

Asymptomatic Transmission is the driver for lockdowns, mask wearing and social distancing – is it a myth? 

One of the largest studies ever undertaken on nearly 10m residents in Wuhan, China found:


Of vital importance yet missing from the debate why?

Researchers in Singapore conducted a study in May which has now been peer reviewed and published. The study provides new evidence for the theory that herd immunity could be achieved at approximately 20% infection rates thanks to T cell cross-immunity from other coronaviruses. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/new-study-shows-potential-of-t-cells-in-the-fight-against-covid-19/


The new shorthand for the convergence of flu season and the COVID-19 pandemic 

It can be difficult for even doctors to reliably tell the difference between the flu and the coronavirus due to their many overlapping symptoms.   



The vaccines are experimental, rushed to market and have not been proven safe or effective.  I will therefore not be partaking in what I deem to be the “clinical trial”. 

Making a decision on any medical intervention must be weighed up on a risk/value basis. The vaccine has no long term safety data and the virus has. 

So for me the decision was easy.




As long as the decision remains ours to make of course.

I will leave you with an extract from a recent Government debate responding to a Petition entitled  “Prevent any restrictions on those who refuse a Covid-19 vaccination”

  • Last year, vaccine hesitancy was in the World Health Organisation’s top 10 “threats to global health”—it was up there with a future pandemic. It is something that we have to address, whether it is related to covid-19 or not.
  • Next year, the UK will take up the presidency of the G7we will need to deal with anti-vaxxers nationally & internationally

What will 2021 bring to the table – The New Normal?







Leave a Reply